Contradiction with Genesis 2:24
This verse emphasizes the concept of monogamy, suggesting that a man shall cleave to his wife, contradicting the allowance of having more than one wife in Deuteronomy 21:15.
Genesis 2:24: Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh.
Contradiction with Matthew 19:4-6
Jesus reiterates the idea of two becoming one flesh, highlighting monogamy and thus contradicting the implications of polygamy in Deuteronomy 21:15.
Matthew 19:4-6: And he answered and said unto them, Have ye not read, that he which made [them] at the beginning made them male and female,
Contradiction with 1 Timothy 3:2
This verse describes the requirement for a bishop to be the husband of one wife, indicating an expectation for monogamy, contradicting the polygamous context of Deuteronomy 21:15.
1 Timothy 3:2: A bishop then must be blameless, the husband of one wife, vigilant, sober, of good behaviour, given to hospitality, apt to teach; [of good...: or, modest]
Contradiction with Titus 1:6
Corroborates the expectation for leaders in the church to have only one wife, thereby opposing the polygamous provisions in Deuteronomy 21:15.
Titus 1:6: If any be blameless, the husband of one wife, having faithful children not accused of riot or unruly.
Contradiction with 1 Corinthians 7:2
Paul advises that each man should have his own wife, and each woman her own husband, promoting monogamous relationships contrary to Deuteronomy 21:15.
1 Corinthians 7:2: Nevertheless, [to avoid] fornication, let every man have his own wife, and let every woman have her own husband.
Paradox #1
Deuteronomy 21:15 could be seen as inconsistent with the biblical theme of fairness and impartiality because it discusses the treatment of multiple wives and their children, potentially implying favoritism. This can conflict with other biblical teachings that emphasize justice and equality.
Paradox #2
The historical inconsistency in Deuteronomy 21:15 could be related to the cultural context of polygamy, which was practiced in ancient times, and how it contrasts with later religious and cultural views that favor monogamy. This can create a conflict between the acceptance of multiple wives in that era and the differing views on family structure in later societies.
Paradox #3
The contradiction in this verse could relate to the apparent acceptance of polygamy, which may conflict with modern views on marriage and equality. It raises questions about fairness in familial relationships and the treatment of individuals within a family, as it seems to show preference based on order of birth rather than equal importance of all members.