Contradiction with Ephesians 6:4
This verse advises fathers to not provoke their children to wrath but to raise them in the nurture and admonition of the Lord, contrasting with the instruction in Deuteronomy 21:20 which involves harsh punishment for a stubborn and rebellious son.
Ephesians 6:4: And, ye fathers, provoke not your children to wrath: but bring them up in the nurture and admonition of the Lord.
Contradiction with Proverbs 22:6
This verse encourages training a child in the way he should go, implying guidance and instruction rather than the severe discipline prescribed in Deuteronomy 21:20.
Proverbs 22:6: Train up a child in the way he should go: and when he is old, he will not depart from it. [Train...: or, Catechise] [in...: Heb. in his way]
Contradiction with Colossians 3:21
It advises fathers not to provoke their children, so they do not become discouraged, which contrasts with the approach of dealing with a rebellious son in Deuteronomy 21:20.
Colossians 3:21: Fathers, provoke not your children [to anger], lest they be discouraged.
Contradiction with Proverbs 13:24
While it endorses discipline, it focuses on careful correction rather than the extreme measures suggested for rebellious children in Deuteronomy 21:20.
Proverbs 13:24: He that spareth his rod hateth his son: but he that loveth him chasteneth him betimes.
Contradiction with Matthew 5:39
Teaches to turn the other cheek rather than seek retributive justice, which contrasts with the punitive measures in Deuteronomy 21:20.
Matthew 5:39: But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also.
Paradox #1
Deuteronomy 21:20 could appear to conflict with the general biblical teachings on love, forgiveness, and mercy. The verse describes a situation that could be seen as harsh or lacking compassion, especially when compared to the messages in the New Testament where Jesus often emphasizes forgiveness and understanding over strict justice. This can create tension between Old Testament laws and New Testament teachings on grace and mercy.
Paradox #2
Deuteronomy 21:20 might raise issues due to its instructions regarding family and societal discipline, which can conflict with modern values on parenting and justice. The way it handles disobedient children might seem harsh and inconsistent with contemporary views on compassion and rehabilitation.
Paradox #3
This verse suggests a societal response to a rebellious child that conflicts with modern understandings of child development and psychology. Today, such behaviors are often addressed through supportive interventions that focus on underlying issues rather than punishment. Scientific approaches to behavior management emphasize understanding, rehabilitation, and the developmental needs of adolescents.
Paradox #4
The contradiction or conflict in this context could be the harsh treatment recommended for a rebellious child, which seems inconsistent with principles of forgiveness and compassion emphasized elsewhere in religious teachings. It may appear to conflict with the idea of love and understanding towards family members.