Contradiction with Deuteronomy 22:21
This verse prescribes stoning for a woman found not to be a virgin on her wedding night, contradicting the process of investigation and evidence in Deuteronomy 22:14.
Deuteronomy 22:21: Then they shall bring out the damsel to the door of her father's house, and the men of her city shall stone her with stones that she die: because she hath wrought folly in Israel, to play the whore in her father's house: so shalt thou put evil away from among you.
Contradiction with John 8:7
Jesus’ response to the accusers of the adulterous woman advocates for forgiveness and introspection, contrasting the accusatory and punitive approach in Deuteronomy 22:14.
John 8:7: So when they continued asking him, he lifted up himself, and said unto them, He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her.
Contradiction with Matthew 7:1
Advises against judging others, which contradicts the accusatory premise of Deuteronomy 22:14.
Matthew 7:1: Judge not, that ye be not judged.
Contradiction with Romans 13:10
Emphasizes love as the fulfillment of the law, contrasting the harsh punitive measures in Deuteronomy 22:14.
Romans 13:10: Love worketh no ill to his neighbour: therefore love [is] the fulfilling of the law.
Contradiction with Galatians 3:28
Discusses equality in Christ, challenging the gender-specific and potentially discriminatory accusations in Deuteronomy 22:14.
Galatians 3:28: There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.
Paradox #1
The issue with Deuteronomy 22:14 might be a perceived inconsistency with teachings on justice and fairness. The verse involves accusations and judgments about a woman's purity, which can conflict with the broader biblical principles of fairness, compassion, and the necessity of credible evidence before making accusations. This can raise concerns about gender equity and the presumption of innocence.
Paradox #2
This Bible verse deals with cultural practices and beliefs during ancient times, particularly concerning marriage and sexual morality. The potential contradiction might arise from the implication that physical evidence was required to prove a woman's virginity, which today we understand is not a reliable indication of sexual history. Modern medicine and science recognize that various biological factors can affect such physical signs, making them inaccurate measures of virginity or moral standing.
Paradox #3
The moral conflict in Deuteronomy 22:14 could be related to the treatment and rights of women. The verse involves doubts about a woman's virginity and the potential for false accusations, which could lead to severe consequences for the woman. This situation raises concerns about fairness, justice, and the woman's dignity and autonomy, as she might not have a say in her defense.