Contradiction with Deuteronomy 24:1
This verse allows a man to divorce his wife if he finds some uncleanness in her, which contradicts the punishment in Deuteronomy 22:19 where the man cannot divorce the wife all his days.
Deuteronomy 24:1: When a man hath taken a wife, and married her, and it come to pass that she find no favour in his eyes, because he hath found some uncleanness in her: then let him write her a bill of divorcement, and give [it] in her hand, and send her out of his house. [some...: Heb. matter of nakedness] [divorcement: Heb. cutting off]
Contradiction with Matthew 5:32
Jesus states that anyone who divorces a wife, except for sexual immorality, causes her to commit adultery, contrasting with the stipulation in Deuteronomy 22:19 that a man who falsely accuses his wife cannot divorce her.
Matthew 5:32: But I say unto you, That whosoever shall put away his wife, saving for the cause of fornication, causeth her to commit adultery: and whosoever shall marry her that is divorced committeth adultery.
Contradiction with Malachi 2:16
God expresses His hatred for divorce, perhaps contrasting with the notion in Deuteronomy 22:19 where the man is forced to stay married despite his actions, questioning the integrity of both marital union and forced continuation.
Malachi 2:16: For the LORD, the God of Israel, saith that he hateth putting away: for [one] covereth violence with his garment, saith the LORD of hosts: therefore take heed to your spirit, that ye deal not treacherously. [that he...: or, if he hate her, put her away] [putting...: Heb. to put away]
Paradox #1
One possible contradiction or inconsistency related to Deuteronomy 22:19 could be the treatment and status of women. In some interpretations, it may appear inconsistent with other biblical teachings about justice and fairness, as it involves monetary compensation paid to a woman's father rather than directly benefitting the woman herself. This might seem at odds with the broader biblical principles that emphasize personal dignity and respect for all individuals.
Paradox #2
Deuteronomy 22:19 involves a situation where a man is penalized for falsely accusing his wife of not being a virgin. The potential doctrinal inconsistency could relate to the perceived inequality in gender treatment, as the woman has limited agency or recourse in the situation compared to the man. Some readers may feel this reflects broader issues about how women are treated differently than men in various biblical laws.
Paradox #3
Deuteronomy 22:19 involves a situation where a man falsely accuses his wife and faces a financial penalty yet remains married to her. The moral conflict arises because the woman's feelings and consent are not considered, and she has to stay with someone who wronged her. This can be seen as inconsistent with modern views on justice and personal autonomy.