Contradiction with John 8:7
This verse contradicts Deuteronomy 22:21 as it emphasizes mercy and forgiveness, with Jesus instructing that only someone without sin should cast a stone, opposing the harsh punishment prescribed in Deuteronomy.
John 8:7: So when they continued asking him, he lifted up himself, and said unto them, He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her.
Contradiction with Ezekiel 18:20
This verse states that individuals are responsible for their own sin and highlights personal responsibility, which contrasts with the collective punishment seen in Deuteronomy 22:21.
Ezekiel 18:20: The soul that sinneth, it shall die. The son shall not bear the iniquity of the father, neither shall the father bear the iniquity of the son: the righteousness of the righteous shall be upon him, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon him.
Contradiction with James 2:13
This verse talks about the triumph of mercy over judgment, which contradicts the execution decree in Deuteronomy 22:21.
James 2:13: For he shall have judgment without mercy, that hath shewed no mercy; and mercy rejoiceth against judgment. [rejoiceth: or, glorieth]
Contradiction with Romans 2:1
This verse emphasizes the idea of avoiding judgment upon others to prevent judging oneself, undermining the judgment principle in Deuteronomy 22:21.
Romans 2:1: Therefore thou art inexcusable, O man, whosoever thou art that judgest: for wherein thou judgest another, thou condemnest thyself; for thou that judgest doest the same things.
Contradiction with Matthew 7:1-2
This passage calls for not judging others to avoid personal judgment, which goes against the strict punitive measures described in Deuteronomy 22:21.
Matthew 7:1-2: Judge not, that ye be not judged.
Paradox #1
This verse might be seen as conflicting with the overall message of forgiveness and compassion found in other parts of the Bible. It prescribes a severe punishment that doesn't seem to align with the New Testament teachings of mercy and forgiveness through Jesus. This difference between Old Testament law and New Testament teachings can appear contradictory to some readers.
Paradox #2
One potential contradiction or conflict could be that the verse appears to prescribe a severe punishment that conflicts with the teachings of mercy and forgiveness emphasized in the New Testament through Jesus Christ. This can seem inconsistent with the message of love and forgiveness promoted in other parts of the Bible.
Paradox #3
The contradiction or conflict with Deuteronomy 22:21 could be related to the cultural and historical context of ancient laws versus modern views on justice and human rights. In ancient times, the laws reflected societal values and norms that are often in stark contrast to contemporary ethical standards, raising questions about fairness and humanity when judged by today's values.
Paradox #4
This verse could be seen as morally contradictory or inconsistent with modern views on justice and human rights. It suggests a severe punishment that might conflict with contemporary beliefs in forgiveness, rehabilitation, and the dignity of every person, regardless of their actions. This can challenge the idea of compassion and understanding that many people value today.