Contradiction with Leviticus 19:20
This verse discusses a different punishment for a similar situation involving a betrothed servant woman, which contrasts with the strict punishment in Deuteronomy 22:23.
Leviticus 19:20: And whosoever lieth carnally with a woman, that [is] a bondmaid, betrothed to an husband, and not at all redeemed, nor freedom given her; she shall be scourged; they shall not be put to death, because she was not free. [betrothed...: or, abused by any: Heb. reproached by (or, for) man] [she shall...: or, they, etc: Heb. there shall be a scourging]
Contradiction with John 8:3-11
In this passage, Jesus forgives the adulterous woman, which differs from the prescribed punishment in Deuteronomy 22:23.
John 8:3-11: And the scribes and Pharisees brought unto him a woman taken in adultery; and when they had set her in the midst,
Contradiction with Matthew 5:32
This verse teaches about divorce and immorality, emphasizing mercy and reconciliation over punishment, differing from the strict consequence in Deuteronomy 22:23.
Matthew 5:32: But I say unto you, That whosoever shall put away his wife, saving for the cause of fornication, causeth her to commit adultery: and whosoever shall marry her that is divorced committeth adultery.
Contradiction with Hosea 3:1
Hosea is commanded to love an adulterous wife, showing love and redemption, which contrasts with the punishment outlined in Deuteronomy 22:23.
Hosea 3:1: Then said the LORD unto me, Go yet, love a woman beloved of [her] friend, yet an adulteress, according to the love of the LORD toward the children of Israel, who look to other gods, and love flagons of wine. [of wine: Heb. of grapes]
Contradiction with 1 Corinthians 6:11
This verse speaks of being washed and sanctified despite past sins, emphasizing forgiveness rather than punishment as in Deuteronomy 22:23.
1 Corinthians 6:11: And such were some of you: but ye are washed, but ye are sanctified, but ye are justified in the name of the Lord Jesus, and by the Spirit of our God.
Paradox #1
Deuteronomy 22:23, which talks about consequences for certain actions involving a betrothed woman, might raise questions about justice and fairness. Some people see a potential contradiction in how this law addresses responsibility and consent, especially by modern standards of ethics and morality. It can seem inconsistent with the moral principles of compassion and fairness emphasized elsewhere in the Bible.
Paradox #2
The potential doctrinal conflict with Deuteronomy 22:23 could arise from its cultural context and how it is applied today. This verse deals with laws regarding morality and punishment, which may seem harsh or inconsistent with modern views on justice and gender equality. Some people might see a conflict between the Old Testament laws and the teachings of compassion and forgiveness in the New Testament, particularly those of Jesus. However, interpretations can vary widely among different religious traditions and scholars.
Paradox #3
The potential contradiction in this verse arises from differing interpretations and applications of biblical laws regarding sexual conduct and consent. Some argue that the ancient context and legal consequences described might not align with modern understandings of consent and justice. This can lead to conflicts in how these ancient laws are viewed or applied today.
Paradox #4
Deuteronomy 22:23 could be seen as morally inconsistent because it suggests a severe penalty for situations of consensual sexual encounters and could be interpreted as treating both parties harshly without considering the complexities of consent, power, or coercion. This may conflict with modern views on justice and individual rights.