Contradiction with Exodus 21:23-25
These verses emphasize the "eye for an eye" principle, which can imply a different form of justice compared to the prescriptive actions in Deuteronomy 22:27.
Exodus 21:23-25: And if [any] mischief follow, then thou shalt give life for life,
Contradiction with Matthew 5:39
In contrast to Deuteronomy 22:27's focus on justice, this verse advocates for non-resistance to evil and turning the other cheek, highlighting forgiveness over retribution.
Matthew 5:39: But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also.
Contradiction with John 8:7
This verse suggests offering forgiveness rather than condemnation, conflicting with the call for punitive actions found in Deuteronomy 22:27.
John 8:7: So when they continued asking him, he lifted up himself, and said unto them, He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her.
Contradiction with Romans 12:19
Emphasizes leaving vengeance to God, contradicting the human-enacted justice portrayed in Deuteronomy 22:27.
Romans 12:19: Dearly beloved, avenge not yourselves, but [rather] give place unto wrath: for it is written, Vengeance [is] mine; I will repay, saith the Lord.
Contradiction with Luke 6:29
Encourages offering the other cheek, contrasting the prescriptive justice of Deuteronomy 22:27 with a message of pacifism and grace.
Luke 6:29: And unto him that smiteth thee on the [one] cheek offer also the other; and him that taketh away thy cloke forbid not [to take thy] coat also.
Paradox #1
This verse could raise moral concerns because it mentions a situation where a victim is not considered guilty due to circumstances beyond their control. However, some may find a contradiction in how similar situations are addressed differently elsewhere. This inconsistency can lead to questions about fairness and justice.