Contradiction with Exodus 22:16
This verse suggests marrying a virgin you seduced, but the focus is on the bride-price and no mention of punishment parallels marriage.
Exodus 22:16: And if a man entice a maid that is not betrothed, and lie with her, he shall surely endow her to be his wife.
Contradiction with 2 Samuel 13:14-16
Amnon's actions against Tamar are condemned, emphasizing that sexual violence is wrongdoing rather than leading to marriage.
2 Samuel 13:14-16: Howbeit he would not hearken unto her voice: but, being stronger than she, forced her, and lay with her.
Contradiction with Matthew 5:32
This verse focuses on the sanctity of marriage and adultery, contradicting any notion stemming from Deuteronomy 22:29 that might perceive forced marriage as legitimate.
Matthew 5:32: But I say unto you, That whosoever shall put away his wife, saving for the cause of fornication, causeth her to commit adultery: and whosoever shall marry her that is divorced committeth adultery.
Contradiction with 1 Corinthians 7:2
Encourages having one's own spouse to avoid fornication, promoting consensual, mutual marriages.
1 Corinthians 7:2: Nevertheless, [to avoid] fornication, let every man have his own wife, and let every woman have her own husband.
Contradiction with Deuteronomy 24:1-4
Discusses grounds for divorce, highlighting voluntary marital relationships rather than compulsory unions based on Deuteronomy 22:29.
Deuteronomy 24:1-4: When a man hath taken a wife, and married her, and it come to pass that she find no favour in his eyes, because he hath found some uncleanness in her: then let him write her a bill of divorcement, and give [it] in her hand, and send her out of his house. [some...: Heb. matter of nakedness] [divorcement: Heb. cutting off]
Paradox #1
Deuteronomy 22:29 may seem to contradict modern ethical beliefs because it describes a situation that could be viewed as treating a serious offense in a way that doesn't align with contemporary views on justice and personal autonomy. This can be seen as inconsistent with principles of compassion and justice found elsewhere in religious teachings.
Paradox #2
Deuteronomy 22:29 might seem contradictory to modern views and interpretations around consent and marriage because it discusses a situation in a way that appears to not align with current ethical standards. It can feel inconsistent with other teachings in the Bible that emphasize love, respect, and mutual consent in relationships. Different interpretations and cultural contexts can help reconcile these issues, but the verse can still feel conflicting to contemporary readers.
Paradox #3
One potential conflict with Deuteronomy 22:29 is the difference in modern understandings of justice and consent compared to ancient practices. In today's context, the idea of requiring a rapist to marry the victim is seen as highly problematic and unjust, recognizing the importance of personal autonomy and the rights of the victim. This contrast between historical practices and contemporary values can be seen as a major inconsistency.
Paradox #4
The contradiction or conflict with that verse arises from the fact that it dictates a man must marry a woman he has assaulted, which can seem unjust and harmful, failing to consider the well-being and autonomy of the woman. It suggests a resolution that may further traumatize the victim rather than provide justice or protection.