Contradiction with Matthew 6:26
Emphasizes God's provision for all creatures, which contradicts the prioritization of human benefit in Deuteronomy 22:7.
Matthew 6:26: Behold the fowls of the air: for they sow not, neither do they reap, nor gather into barns; yet your heavenly Father feedeth them. Are ye not much better than they?
Contradiction with Genesis 1:29-30
All plants and creatures were intended as sustenance for all beings, contradicting the selective usage in Deuteronomy 22:7.
Genesis 1:29-30: And God said, Behold, I have given you every herb bearing seed, which [is] upon the face of all the earth, and every tree, in the which [is] the fruit of a tree yielding seed; to you it shall be for meat. [bearing...: Heb. seeding seed] [yielding...: Heb. seeding seed]
Contradiction with Proverbs 12:10
Suggests righteous treatment of animals, which may conflict with the idea of exploiting them as in Deuteronomy 22:7.
Proverbs 12:10: A righteous [man] regardeth the life of his beast: but the tender mercies of the wicked [are] cruel. [tender...: or, bowels]
Contradiction with Matthew 10:29
Expresses the idea of valuing sparrows, implying their worth beyond usage, differing from Deuteronomy 22:7's perspective on animals.
Matthew 10:29: Are not two sparrows sold for a farthing? and one of them shall not fall on the ground without your Father. [farthing: it is in value halfpenny farthing in the original, as being the tenth part of the Roman penny]
Paradox #1
Deuteronomy 22:7 advises letting the mother bird go when taking the young or eggs, suggesting a message of compassion and sustainability. A possible contradiction might arise when comparing this with other biblical verses that involve the destruction of entire animal populations or show less compassion towards animals, causing a difference in the approach to animal welfare or ethical treatment in various contexts.
Paradox #2
The contradiction or conflict might be the idea of causing harm versus showing care. It suggests letting the mother bird go to ensure your own well-being, which could seem like using kindness just for personal benefit instead of genuine compassion.