Contradiction with Hosea 3:1
This verse describes the Lord's command for Hosea to love his wife again, despite her being an adulteress, suggesting reconciliation and remarriage.
Hosea 3:1: Then said the LORD unto me, Go yet, love a woman beloved of [her] friend, yet an adulteress, according to the love of the LORD toward the children of Israel, who look to other gods, and love flagons of wine. [of wine: Heb. of grapes]
Contradiction with Jeremiah 3:1
In this verse, although it mentions not returning to a former spouse, God invites Israel to return, symbolizing reconciliation against the rule stated in Deuteronomy 24:4.
Jeremiah 3:1: They say, If a man put away his wife, and she go from him, and become another man's, shall he return unto her again? shall not that land be greatly polluted? but thou hast played the harlot with many lovers; yet return again to me, saith the LORD. [They say: Heb. Saying]
Contradiction with Matthew 5:32
Jesus allows for divorce on the grounds of fornication, without discussing the restriction on remarrying the same person, suggesting a different context or understanding.
Matthew 5:32: But I say unto you, That whosoever shall put away his wife, saving for the cause of fornication, causeth her to commit adultery: and whosoever shall marry her that is divorced committeth adultery.
Contradiction with 1 Corinthians 7:11
Paul advises reconciliation for separated couples, without specific constraints like those in Deuteronomy, suggesting a focus on unity.
1 Corinthians 7:11: But and if she depart, let her remain unmarried, or be reconciled to [her] husband: and let not the husband put away [his] wife.
Paradox #1
Deuteronomy 24:4 might be seen as inconsistent with the broader biblical messages about forgiveness and reconciliation. The verse prohibits a divorced woman from returning to her first husband after marrying another man, which can be seen as conflicting with the idea of forgiveness and second chances encouraged elsewhere in the Bible. This can seem at odds with stories of forgiveness, like the Prodigal Son, where returning and being accepted again is possible.
Paradox #2
Deuteronomy 24:4 might be seen as inconsistent with the teachings in the New Testament about forgiveness and grace. In the Old Testament, it outlines specific laws that may seem strict or inflexible. However, the New Testament, particularly through Jesus' teachings, emphasizes forgiveness and redemption, even encouraging people to forgive others repeatedly. This can create a perceived conflict between upholding laws and embracing forgiveness and grace.
Paradox #3
Deuteronomy 24:4 could be seen as having a possible contradiction or conflict when compared to other parts of the Bible that speak about forgiveness and restoration. This verse restricts a specific situation in remarriage, which might seem to conflict with broader biblical themes of second chances and redemption. However, interpretations vary, and religious scholars often discuss these nuances.
Paradox #4
This verse involves rules about marriage and divorce. The potential moral conflict arises when compared to other instances in the Bible where forgiveness and second chances are promoted. Here, the rule seems strict, which may conflict with the broader message of redemption and forgiveness found in other parts of the scripture.