Contradiction with Exodus 21:24
Deuteronomy 25:11 implies a specific punishment for a particular act, while Exodus 21:24 suggests a broader principle of justice ("an eye for an eye") that doesn't specify such personal involvement or detailed punishment for this particular act.
Exodus 21:24: Eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot,
Contradiction with Matthew 5:39
Deuteronomy 25:11 advocates a physical punishment for a physical act, whereas Matthew 5:39 suggests non-retaliation and turning the other cheek when wronged, proposing a more peaceful resolution to conflict.
Matthew 5:39: But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also.
Contradiction with Romans 12:19
Deuteronomy 25:11 outlines a system of personal retribution, while Romans 12:19 advises against personal vengeance, highlighting that vengeance belongs to God and emphasizing forgiveness over retribution.
Romans 12:19: Dearly beloved, avenge not yourselves, but [rather] give place unto wrath: for it is written, Vengeance [is] mine; I will repay, saith the Lord.
Contradiction with 1 Thessalonians 5:15
Deuteronomy 25:11 indicates a punitive consequence for certain actions, whereas 1 Thessalonians 5:15 encourages believers to seek good instead of repaying evil for evil, promoting forgiveness and patience.
1 Thessalonians 5:15: See that none render evil for evil unto any [man]; but ever follow that which is good, both among yourselves, and to all [men].
Paradox #1
Deuteronomy 25:11 could be seen as inconsistent with broader biblical themes of compassion and non-violence. The specific rule it presents might conflict with the message of forgiveness and love found in other parts of the Bible, such as the teachings of Jesus in the New Testament.
Paradox #2
Deuteronomy 25:11 might seem harsh or extreme, and some people might see it as not matching the more compassionate or forgiving themes found in other Bible teachings. This could create a feeling of inconsistency when compared to verses that emphasize kindness and mercy.
Paradox #3
This verse could be seen as morally inconsistent because it prescribes a punishment that might seem harsh or disproportionate to some people. It may seem to conflict with principles of forgiveness or understanding, especially if taken literally in modern contexts.