Contradictions and Paradoxes in Deuteronomy 25:7

Check out Contradictions Catalog of Deuteronomy 25:7 for the comprehensive list of verses that contradicts Deuteronomy 25:7. Some key contradictions and paradoxes are described below.

According to Moses, if a man does not want to marry his brother's wife after his brother dies, the woman should tell the town leaders that he is not doing what is expected. This rule was made to help take care of families and keep their names and memories alive in their community.

Deuteronomy 25:7: And if the man like not to take his brother's wife, then let his brother's wife go up to the gate unto the elders, and say, My husband's brother refuseth to raise up unto his brother a name in Israel, he will not perform the duty of my husband's brother. [brother's: or, next kinsman's]

Contradiction with Matthew 5:38-39

While Deuteronomy 25:7 addresses addressing the brother-in-law's refusal in a specific legal case, Matthew 5:38-39 emphasizes turning the other cheek and not pursuing personal revenge, promoting forgiveness over formalized justice methods.

Matthew 5:38-39: Ye have heard that it hath been said, An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth:

Contradiction with Romans 12:17-19

Deuteronomy 25:7 focuses on addressing a specific familial obligation and refusal within a community, whereas Romans 12:17-19 urges individuals not to repay evil with evil and to leave vengeance to God, promoting peace and personal forgiveness instead.

Romans 12:17-19: Recompense to no man evil for evil. Provide things honest in the sight of all men.

Contradiction with 1 Peter 3:9

This verse instructs believers not to repay evil with evil or insult with insult but to bless others instead. This directive contrasts with the legally structured approach in Deuteronomy 25:7 for dealing with grievances.

1 Peter 3:9: Not rendering evil for evil, or railing for railing: but contrariwise blessing; knowing that ye are thereunto called, that ye should inherit a blessing.

Paradox #1

Deuteronomy 25:7 could be seen as presenting a contradiction or inconsistency in the context of modern values regarding individual freedom and autonomy. In contemporary society, there's a strong emphasis on the right to make personal choices without external pressure. This verse, however, suggests a cultural obligation that could conflict with those modern values, highlighting the tension between traditional duties and individual rights.

← Deuteronomy 25:6
Share
Deuteronomy 25:8 →
Disclaimer: The content provided at PolarBible.com is for educational purposes only. Readers have the full right to agree or disagree with the interpretations and conclusions presented. We take no responsibility for any actions or decisions taken based on the information shared as Polar Verses.