Contradictions and Paradoxes in Deuteronomy 25:9

Check out Contradictions Catalog of Deuteronomy 25:9 for the comprehensive list of verses that contradicts Deuteronomy 25:9. Some key contradictions and paradoxes are described below.

According to Moses, if a man doesn’t help his brother’s family by marrying the brother's widow, she can take his shoe and spit in his face to show he did something wrong. This shows how important family care was back then.

Deuteronomy 25:9: Then shall his brother's wife come unto him in the presence of the elders, and loose his shoe from off his foot, and spit in his face, and shall answer and say, So shall it be done unto that man that will not build up his brother's house.

Contradiction with Matthew 5:39

This verse advocates for turning the other cheek instead of seeking retribution or public disgrace, which contradicts the public act of removing a shoe and spitting in the face in Deuteronomy 25:9.

Matthew 5:39: But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also.

Contradiction with Romans 12:17

Advises against repaying evil for evil and to live peaceably, contrasting with the punitive and publicly humiliating act described in Deuteronomy 25:9.

Romans 12:17: Recompense to no man evil for evil. Provide things honest in the sight of all men.

Contradiction with Proverbs 20:22

Encourages waiting for the Lord for vengeance rather than personal retaliation, opposing the immediate personal and public action found in Deuteronomy 25:9.

Proverbs 20:22: Say not thou, I will recompense evil; [but] wait on the LORD, and he shall save thee.

Contradiction with Luke 6:29

Suggests offering no resistance to an evil person and offering the other cheek, which differs from the approach of publicly confronting and shaming someone in Deuteronomy 25:9.

Luke 6:29: And unto him that smiteth thee on the [one] cheek offer also the other; and him that taketh away thy cloke forbid not [to take thy] coat also.

Paradox #1

Deuteronomy 25:9 describes an action taken if a man refuses to fulfill a family duty, which might seem harsh or unusual by today's standards. The potential contradiction lies in the New Testament's emphasis on forgiveness and turning the other cheek, which could seem inconsistent with the actions described.

Paradox #2

The contradiction or conflict in Deuteronomy 25:9 could be seen in the cultural practice it describes, which may seem harsh or embarrassing by modern standards. Some people might find the action of public shaming for not fulfilling a familial duty to be inconsistent with more compassionate or forgiving approaches found elsewhere in religious teachings. This can create tension between cultural traditions and evolving moral perspectives.

← Deuteronomy 25:8
Share
Deuteronomy 25:10 →
Disclaimer: The content provided at PolarBible.com is for educational purposes only. Readers have the full right to agree or disagree with the interpretations and conclusions presented. We take no responsibility for any actions or decisions taken based on the information shared as Polar Verses.