Contradiction with Matthew 6:3-4
In these verses, Jesus emphasizes giving in secret without announcing it, whereas Deuteronomy 26:13 involves a public declaration of giving and following God's commandments.
Matthew 6:3-4: But when thou doest alms, let not thy left hand know what thy right hand doeth:
Contradiction with Matthew 6:1
This verse advises against doing righteous acts before others to be seen by them, while Deuteronomy 26:13 involves a public affirmation of one's compliance with God's commandments in their tithe and offerings.
Matthew 6:1: Take heed that ye do not your alms before men, to be seen of them: otherwise ye have no reward of your Father which is in heaven. [alms: or, righteousness] [of your: or, with your]
Contradiction with Luke 18:12
This verse describes a Pharisee who boasts about fasting and tithing, highlighting self-righteousness, contrasting with the humble acknowledgment of obedience and provision described in Deuteronomy 26:13.
Luke 18:12: I fast twice in the week, I give tithes of all that I possess.
Contradiction with Matthew 23:23
Jesus criticizes the Pharisees for tithing meticulously but neglecting justice, mercy, and faith, indicating that tithing alone, as in Deuteronomy 26:13, is not enough without the weightier matters of the law.
Matthew 23:23: Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye pay tithe of mint and anise and cummin, and have omitted the weightier [matters] of the law, judgment, mercy, and faith: these ought ye to have done, and not to leave the other undone. [anise: Gr. dill]
Contradiction with Hebrews 10:1
This verse speaks to the law as a shadow of good things to come and not the very image, suggesting a contrast to the physical and verbal practices prescribed in Deuteronomy 26:13.
Hebrews 10:1: For the law having a shadow of good things to come, [and] not the very image of the things, can never with those sacrifices which they offered year by year continually make the comers thereunto perfect.
Paradox #1
This verse may raise questions about the fairness of prioritizing specific groups for care and support when there could be others in need as well. It highlights a potential conflict between helping designated groups versus being more inclusive in addressing broader needs within the community.