Contradiction with Romans 13:1
Romans 13:1 calls for submission to governing authorities, while Deuteronomy 27:19 curses those who pervert justice, implying that not all authority is just or should be supported.
Romans 13:1: Let every soul be subject unto the higher powers. For there is no power but of God: the powers that be are ordained of God. [ordained: or, ordered]
Contradiction with 1 Peter 2:18
1 Peter 2:18 instructs servants to submit even to harsh masters, which may conflict with the defense of the oppressed emphasized by Deuteronomy 27:19.
1 Peter 2:18: Servants, [be] subject to [your] masters with all fear; not only to the good and gentle, but also to the froward.
Contradiction with Proverbs 24:21-22
Proverbs 24:21-22 advise fearing the Lord and the king, potentially contradicting Deuteronomy 27:19 when authority perpetrates injustice.
Proverbs 24:21-22: My son, fear thou the LORD and the king: [and] meddle not with them that are given to change: [them...: Heb. changers]
Contradiction with Titus 3:1
Titus 3:1 calls for obedience to rulers and authorities, yet Deuteronomy 27:19 highlights the need to uphold justice even against unjust rulings.
Titus 3:1: Put them in mind to be subject to principalities and powers, to obey magistrates, to be ready to every good work,
Paradox #1
Deuteronomy 27:19 speaks about justice and fairness, especially towards vulnerable groups. A potential contradiction arises when considering other parts of the Bible where individuals or groups seem treated unfairly or harshly by divine command, such as in certain warfare or punishment narratives. This raises questions about how God's justice is portrayed consistently throughout the scriptures.
Paradox #2
The potential doctrinal conflict with Deuteronomy 27:19 could arise when comparing it to passages that emphasize mercy and forgiveness. While this verse emphasizes justice for vulnerable individuals, some New Testament teachings focus on forgiveness, which might seem to downplay strict justice. Balancing justice and mercy could be seen as a point of tension.
Paradox #3
The verse emphasizes justice for the vulnerable, particularly widows, orphans, and foreigners. A historical inconsistency could arise if you consider instances in biblical or historical narratives where these groups were not protected or were mistreated despite such clear commandments. This could lead to discussions on how well ancient societies practiced these teachings.
Paradox #4
Deuteronomy 27:19 talks about being against unfair treatment of strangers or vulnerable people. A contradiction or conflict could arise if people who say they follow this teaching act unfairly or ignore the needs of strangers and vulnerable people. It would be inconsistent if they only apply this principle when it suits them but not in situations where it is hard or inconvenient.