Contradiction with Romans 3:28
This verse states that a man is justified by faith without the deeds of the law, contradicting the idea that following the law is crucial for blessings.
Romans 3:28: Therefore we conclude that a man is justified by faith without the deeds of the law.
Contradiction with Galatians 3:11
It asserts that no one is justified by the law in the sight of God, which contrasts with the curse mentioned in Deuteronomy 27:26 for not following the law.
Galatians 3:11: But that no man is justified by the law in the sight of God, [it is] evident: for, The just shall live by faith.
Contradiction with James 2:10
This verse suggests that breaking one part of the law is equivalent to breaking all of it, emphasizing the impossibility of fully adhering to the law versus the expectation in Deuteronomy.
James 2:10: For whosoever shall keep the whole law, and yet offend in one [point], he is guilty of all.
Contradiction with Galatians 2:16
It claims that a person is not justified by the works of the law but by faith in Jesus, conflicting with the necessity of law observance in Deuteronomy 27:26.
Galatians 2:16: Knowing that a man is not justified by the works of the law, but by the faith of Jesus Christ, even we have believed in Jesus Christ, that we might be justified by the faith of Christ, and not by the works of the law: for by the works of the law shall no flesh be justified.
Contradiction with Hebrews 7:19
Indicates the law made nothing perfect, contrasting with the implication of the law's importance in Deuteronomy 27:26.
Hebrews 7:19: For the law made nothing perfect, but the bringing in of a better hope [did]; by the which we draw nigh unto God. [the bringing...: or, it was the bringing in]
Paradox #1
Deuteronomy 27:26 emphasizes the importance of following all the laws, suggesting that breaking even one brings a curse. This might conflict with the idea of grace and forgiveness found in other parts of the Bible, where repentance and faith offer redemption despite human failings. This could be seen as a tension between law and grace.
Paradox #2
Deuteronomy 27:26 emphasizes the need to follow all the laws. A potential doctrinal conflict might arise when considering the New Testament teachings, where emphasis is placed on salvation through faith in Jesus rather than strict adherence to the law. This can create a tension between adhering to old laws and embracing new teachings of faith and grace.
Paradox #3
This verse underscores the importance of following all God's laws, but it can be seen as conflicting with other parts of the Bible that emphasize grace and forgiveness, like in the New Testament where Jesus offers redemption even when people fall short. This tension between law and grace might seem inconsistent to some readers.
Paradox #4
The contradiction in this verse could be the tension between the idea of following all laws perfectly and the understanding that humans are inherently imperfect and may struggle to keep every law. This raises questions about forgiveness, human fallibility, and whether strict adherence to law is possible or realistic.