Contradiction with Deuteronomy 28:7
This verse mentions that the Lord shall cause enemies who rise against thee to be smitten before thy face, which is a contradiction as it promises victory over enemies rather than defeat.
Deuteronomy 28:7: The LORD shall cause thine enemies that rise up against thee to be smitten before thy face: they shall come out against thee one way, and flee before thee seven ways.
Contradiction with Isaiah 54:17
This verse states that no weapon formed against thee shall prosper, suggesting protection and success against enemies, which contradicts the defeat and scattering by enemies mentioned in Deuteronomy 28:25.
Isaiah 54:17: No weapon that is formed against thee shall prosper; and every tongue [that] shall rise against thee in judgment thou shalt condemn. This [is] the heritage of the servants of the LORD, and their righteousness [is] of me, saith the LORD.
Contradiction with Romans 8:37
The verse declares that in all things, we are more than conquerors through Him that loved us, indicating victory rather than being defeated and scattered, as mentioned in Deuteronomy 28:25.
Romans 8:37: Nay, in all these things we are more than conquerors through him that loved us.
Paradox #1
The conflict could be that this verse, which talks about the consequences for disobedience, might seem to contradict the idea of a loving and forgiving God. Some might see it as inconsistent with the message of mercy and grace found in other parts of the Bible.
Paradox #2
Deuteronomy 28:25 describes a situation where people will be defeated by their enemies. Some might find a contradiction or inconsistency in the broader biblical narrative if elsewhere it is stated that the same people are promised protection and victory over their enemies as long as they follow God's commandments. This could be seen as conflicting messages about divine protection and punishment.
Paradox #3
The contradiction in this verse could arise from the idea of divine retribution and the punishment of a group or nation for their actions. Some might see a conflict between the concept of a loving and merciful deity and one that actively causes suffering or defeat. This raises questions about justice and fairness, especially if individuals within the group are innocent or have not contributed to the wrongdoing.