Contradiction with Psalm 91:11
This verse speaks of God's protection and guarding, contradicting the notion of being left unprotected as implied in Deuteronomy 28:26.
Psalm 91:11: For he shall give his angels charge over thee, to keep thee in all thy ways.
Contradiction with Matthew 10:29-31
These verses illustrate God's care for even the sparrows, suggesting divine attention and protection unlike the abandonment implied in Deuteronomy 28:26.
Matthew 10:29-31: Are not two sparrows sold for a farthing? and one of them shall not fall on the ground without your Father. [farthing: it is in value halfpenny farthing in the original, as being the tenth part of the Roman penny]
Contradiction with Isaiah 54:17
Promises no weapon formed against God's people shall prosper, contrasting the vulnerability suggested in Deuteronomy 28:26.
Isaiah 54:17: No weapon that is formed against thee shall prosper; and every tongue [that] shall rise against thee in judgment thou shalt condemn. This [is] the heritage of the servants of the LORD, and their righteousness [is] of me, saith the LORD.
Contradiction with Romans 8:38-39
Assures that nothing can separate us from the love of God, contradicting the idea of being forsaken as in Deuteronomy 28:26.
Romans 8:38-39: For I am persuaded, that neither death, nor life, nor angels, nor principalities, nor powers, nor things present, nor things to come,
Paradox #1
The possible theological conflict with Deuteronomy 28:26 lies in the harshness of divine punishment described, which might seem inconsistent with the idea of a loving and merciful God. This can be challenging for some believers to reconcile with the overall message of compassion and forgiveness in the Bible.
Paradox #2
The contradiction or inconsistency with the content in Deuteronomy 28:26 could arise when comparing the described events or outcomes with historical records or other parts of the Bible. If historical evidence or other scriptures do not align with the described consequences or if there is a discrepancy in how similar situations were dealt with elsewhere in the text, this could lead to a perceived conflict. However, without specific historical records directly conflicting with this verse, it might be challenging to pinpoint a clear contradiction, as many interpretations exist within theological contexts.
Paradox #3
The contradiction in this verse could be seen in the harshness of the punishment described, which might seem inconsistent with the idea of a loving and forgiving deity. This could conflict with the notion of mercy and compassion that is also present in other parts of the Bible.