Contradiction with Psalm 37:25
This verse states that the righteous will not be forsaken, nor their seed begging for bread, which contradicts the curse in Deuteronomy 28:32 of children being taken and parents being powerless.
Psalm 37:25: I have been young, and [now] am old; yet have I not seen the righteous forsaken, nor his seed begging bread.
Contradiction with Isaiah 49:25
This verse states that God will contend with those who contend with His people and will save their children, contradicting the idea of children being taken away.
Isaiah 49:25: But thus saith the LORD, Even the captives of the mighty shall be taken away, and the prey of the terrible shall be delivered: for I will contend with him that contendeth with thee, and I will save thy children. [captives: Heb. captivity]
Contradiction with Jeremiah 31:16-17
These verses promise that children will return from the land of the enemy, contradicting the permanence of the loss suggested in Deuteronomy 28:32.
Jeremiah 31:16-17: Thus saith the LORD; Refrain thy voice from weeping, and thine eyes from tears: for thy work shall be rewarded, saith the LORD; and they shall come again from the land of the enemy.
Contradiction with Matthew 19:14
Jesus invites children to come to Him, emphasizing their belonging to God's kingdom, which contradicts the loss and separation in Deuteronomy 28:32.
Matthew 19:14: But Jesus said, Suffer little children, and forbid them not, to come unto me: for of such is the kingdom of heaven.
Contradiction with Proverbs 22:6
This verse suggests training a child in the way they should go, with the implication they will not depart from their upbringing, contradicting the loss and separation in Deuteronomy 28:32.
Proverbs 22:6: Train up a child in the way he should go: and when he is old, he will not depart from it. [Train...: or, Catechise] [in...: Heb. in his way]
Paradox #1
Deuteronomy 28:32 talks about children being taken away, which could conflict with the belief that God is loving and protects His followers. It may seem inconsistent because it describes a punishment that is harsh and painful, conflicting with the idea of a benevolent God.
Paradox #2
The verse highlights a situation of loss and captivity, which can seem inconsistent with the belief in a just and protective God. Some might view this as conflicting with the idea that God always rewards the faithful and protects them from harm. However, it can also be seen as part of the broader biblical theme that actions have consequences, and turning away from divine commandments may lead to such hardships. It’s important to consider that many biblical themes, such as justice, mercy, and free will, can lead to perceived contradictions depending on interpretation.
Paradox #3
The contradiction in that verse could be seen in the concept of punishment. It describes a situation where children are taken away as a consequence for the actions of their parents or community. This raises questions about fairness and justice, as it seems unjust for children to suffer consequences for something they did not do.