Contradiction with Psalm 37:25
This verse suggests that the righteous are never forsaken, contradicting the idea of losing all labor's fruits as in Deuteronomy 28:33.
Psalm 37:25: I have been young, and [now] am old; yet have I not seen the righteous forsaken, nor his seed begging bread.
Contradiction with Proverbs 13:22
This verse indicates that the wealth of sinners is laid up for the just, contradicting the loss of harvest to others described in Deuteronomy 28:33.
Proverbs 13:22: A good [man] leaveth an inheritance to his children's children: and the wealth of the sinner [is] laid up for the just.
Paradox #1
One possible contradiction with Deuteronomy 28:33 could be the idea of a loving and just God allowing or causing suffering and loss for His chosen people. This can be difficult to reconcile with the understanding of God as compassionate and protective.
Paradox #2
The potential contradiction or conflict with Deuteronomy 28:33 could relate to historical events where the Israelites were conquered and oppressed by foreign nations, which might seem inconsistent with other biblical promises of protection and prosperity for following God's laws. It raises questions about how these outcomes align with the covenant relationship described elsewhere in the Bible.
Paradox #3
This verse could be seen as contradictory because it suggests that misfortune is a punishment from God, which might conflict with the belief in a loving and just deity. People might question why a benevolent God would allow suffering or hardship as a form of punishment, seeming inconsistent with the notion of unconditional love and compassion.