Contradiction with Philippians 4:19
This verse promises that God will supply all your needs, in contrast to Deuteronomy 28:48, which speaks of serving enemies in hunger and thirst.
Philippians 4:19: But my God shall supply all your need according to his riches in glory by Christ Jesus.
Contradiction with Matthew 6:31-33
These verses assure believers not to worry about food, drink, or clothing because God knows and provides their needs, conflicting with the scarcity described in Deuteronomy 28:48.
Matthew 6:31-33: Therefore take no thought, saying, What shall we eat? or, What shall we drink? or, Wherewithal shall we be clothed?
Contradiction with Psalm 34:10
This verse states that those who seek the Lord will lack no good thing, contradicting the deprivation mentioned in Deuteronomy 28:48.
Psalm 34:10: The young lions do lack, and suffer hunger: but they that seek the LORD shall not want any good [thing].
Contradiction with Psalm 23:1
Declares that the Lord is my shepherd, I shall not want, which is a contrast to the lack described in Deuteronomy 28:48.
Psalm 23:1: [A Psalm of David.] The LORD [is] my shepherd; I shall not want.
Contradiction with 2 Corinthians 9:8
This verse speaks about God's provision, ensuring that you will have all you need in abundance, opposite to the deprivation in Deuteronomy 28:48.
2 Corinthians 9:8: And God [is] able to make all grace abound toward you; that ye, always having all sufficiency in all [things], may abound to every good work:
Paradox #1
Theological discussions around this could focus on the idea of divine punishment and suffering, questioning how a loving and just God allows such severe consequences to befall people. Some may struggle to reconcile the harshness described with the concept of a merciful deity. This creates a perceived contradiction or tension for some believers.
Paradox #2
One potential contradiction with Deuteronomy 28:48 might be its association with historical events or groups that came long after the text was written, such as its interpretation in various religious and cultural contexts. Different groups at different times may have believed this verse referred to their specific situation, leading to inconsistent applications and understandings.
Paradox #3
The contradiction in that verse could be related to the concept of curses or divine punishment having real-world, tangible effects such as hunger, thirst, nakedness, or oppression, which cannot be empirically measured or scientifically validated. Science relies on observable and testable phenomena, while the concept of curses falls into the realm of spiritual or supernatural beliefs, which are not subject to empirical testing.
Paradox #4
The contradiction or conflict in Deuteronomy 28:48 might arise from the idea of punishment and suffering being used as a divine consequence. This presents a tension between the concept of a loving and merciful deity and the harshness of imposing severe hardships as a form of discipline or retribution. This can lead to questions about the nature of divine justice and compassion.