Contradiction with Numbers 13:33
This verse describes the Anakim as giants, which contrasts with Deuteronomy 2:11 that equates them to the Rephaim, who are portrayed more as ancient and mighty warriors rather than specifically giants.
Numbers 13:33: And there we saw the giants, the sons of Anak, [which come] of the giants: and we were in our own sight as grasshoppers, and so we were in their sight.
Contradiction with Joshua 15:13-14
These verses discuss Caleb driving out the descendants of Anak from Hebron, suggesting the Anakim were localized and conquerable, which contradicts the notion in Deuteronomy 2:11 that they were as fearsome as the Rephaim, implying enduring strength and power.
Joshua 15:13-14: And unto Caleb the son of Jephunneh he gave a part among the children of Judah, according to the commandment of the LORD to Joshua, [even] the city of Arba the father of Anak, which [city is] Hebron. [the city...: or, Kirjatharba]
Contradiction with Genesis 14:5
This verse refers to Rephaim being defeated by Chedorlaomer, contradicting the possible implication in Deuteronomy 2:11 that the Anakim equated with Rephaim might possess invincible or formidable power.
Genesis 14:5: And in the fourteenth year came Chedorlaomer, and the kings that [were] with him, and smote the Rephaims in Ashteroth Karnaim, and the Zuzims in Ham, and the Emims in Shaveh Kiriathaim, [Shaveh...: or, The plain of Kiriathaim]
Paradox #1
Deuteronomy 2:11 refers to a group of people called the Rephaim, who are described as giants. The contradiction could be that there is little archaeological evidence or historical records outside the Bible to confirm the existence of such giants. This inconsistency raises questions about the historical accuracy of these accounts compared to modern understandings of ancient civilizations.