Contradiction with Exodus 20:13
Deuteronomy 2:24 involves going to war and taking land through conflict, while Exodus 20:13 commands "Thou shalt not kill," promoting the sanctity of life.
Exodus 20:13: Thou shalt not kill.
Contradiction with Matthew 5:9
Deuteronomy 2:24 speaks of engaging in battle, whereas Matthew 5:9 blesses peacemakers, which contradicts the act of going to war.
Matthew 5:9: Blessed [are] the peacemakers: for they shall be called the children of God.
Contradiction with Matthew 5:44
Deuteronomy 2:24 speaks of attacking and conquering, while Matthew 5:44 advises to love enemies and do good to them instead.
Matthew 5:44: But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;
Contradiction with Romans 12:19
Deuteronomy 2:24 encourages taking action against enemies, whereas Romans 12:19 advises against taking vengeance and leaving room for God's wrath.
Romans 12:19: Dearly beloved, avenge not yourselves, but [rather] give place unto wrath: for it is written, Vengeance [is] mine; I will repay, saith the Lord.
Contradiction with Isaiah 2:4
Deuteronomy 2:24 talks about warfare, while Isaiah 2:4 envisions a time of peace when nations shall not learn war anymore.
Isaiah 2:4: And he shall judge among the nations, and shall rebuke many people: and they shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruninghooks: nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war any more. [pruninghooks: or, scythes]
Contradiction with Psalm 34:14
Deuteronomy 2:24 involves preparing for conflict, whereas Psalm 34:14 calls for seeking peace and pursuing it.
Psalm 34:14: Depart from evil, and do good; seek peace, and pursue it.
Contradiction with Proverbs 3:31
Deuteronomy 2:24 involves taking land and dealing with adversaries through force, whereas Proverbs 3:31 warns against envying a violent man or choosing his ways.
Proverbs 3:31: Envy thou not the oppressor, and choose none of his ways. [the oppressor: Heb. a man of violence]
Paradox #1
Some people might see a contradiction in this verse because it talks about God instructing the Israelites to engage in battle and take land from another nation. This can seem inconsistent with other parts of the Bible that emphasize peace, love, and not harming others. This difference could lead to questions about God's nature and how He directs people.
Paradox #2
Deuteronomy 2:24 might present a contradiction or inconsistency regarding the conquest of specific lands. The verse suggests a command to take over territory from King Sihon of the Amorites. Some might consider potential conflicts by comparing it with other biblical accounts or archaeological evidence, which sometimes offer differing timelines or details about when and how certain lands were conquered by the Israelites. These discrepancies can lead to discussions about historical accuracy and the consistency of biblical narratives.
Paradox #3
The potential contradiction in this verse could involve the idea of taking land by force, raising questions about the morality of conquest and the ethics of displacing others from their land. This may conflict with values of peace and respect for others’ rights.