Contradiction with Exodus 20:13
Exodus 20:13 states "Thou shalt not kill," which contradicts with Deuteronomy 2:34 where the Israelites destroy all the men, women, and children of the city.
Exodus 20:13: Thou shalt not kill.
Contradiction with Matthew 5:44
Matthew 5:44 teaches to "love your enemies," which contradicts the actions in Deuteronomy 2:34 where enemies are utterly destroyed.
Matthew 5:44: But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;
Contradiction with Matthew 22:39
Matthew 22:39 commands to "love thy neighbor as thyself," conflicting with the complete destruction described in Deuteronomy 2:34.
Matthew 22:39: On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets.
Contradiction with Romans 12:19
Romans 12:19 advises against taking vengeance, which contradicts the destruction described in Deuteronomy 2:34.
Romans 12:19: Dearly beloved, avenge not yourselves, but [rather] give place unto wrath: for it is written, Vengeance [is] mine; I will repay, saith the Lord.
Contradiction with Ezekiel 33:11
Ezekiel 33:11 states God has no pleasure in the death of the wicked, contrasting with the destruction overtones in Deuteronomy 2:34.
Ezekiel 33:11: Say unto them, [As] I live, saith the Lord GOD, I have no pleasure in the death of the wicked; but that the wicked turn from his way and live: turn ye, turn ye from your evil ways; for why will ye die, O house of Israel?
Paradox #1
The verse could raise questions about the morality of violence and the concept of a loving God commanding the destruction of entire cities, including civilians. This might seem to conflict with New Testament teachings about love, forgiveness, and valuing all human life.
Paradox #2
Deuteronomy 2:34 describes the Israelites capturing cities and destroying everyone in them. This could conflict with biblical teachings on love and mercy, such as in the New Testament where Jesus emphasizes loving enemies and showing compassion. The contrast between these actions and teachings could be seen as an inconsistency in how justice and mercy are applied.
Paradox #3
Some people might find a contradiction in Deuteronomy 2:34 because it describes the complete destruction of certain populations, including children, which seems to conflict with the Bible's teachings on compassion and mercy. Critics may see this as inconsistent with other parts of the scripture that promote kindness and justice.
Paradox #4
The contradiction in that verse could be related to the historical or archaeological evidence about the events described. While the verse narrates a conquest, there may be little or no scientific evidence supporting that such events happened as described, leading to questions about its historical accuracy.
Paradox #5
This verse describes the Israelites capturing cities and destroying every inhabitant, including men, women, and children. The moral conflict arises from the idea of a divinely sanctioned action that involves violence and the killing of innocents, which contrasts with teachings about compassion and mercy elsewhere in religious texts.