Contradiction with Exodus 20:13
This verse commands "Thou shalt not kill," which contradicts the taking of spoils and destruction in war mentioned in Deuteronomy 2:35.
Exodus 20:13: Thou shalt not kill.
Contradiction with Matthew 5:44
This verse teaches to "love your enemies" and contrasts with the conquest and taking possessions from enemies depicted in Deuteronomy 2:35.
Matthew 5:44: But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;
Contradiction with Isaiah 2:4
This verse envisions a time of peace where nations shall not "learn war any more," contrasting with the warlike actions in Deuteronomy 2:35.
Isaiah 2:4: And he shall judge among the nations, and shall rebuke many people: and they shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruninghooks: nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war any more. [pruninghooks: or, scythes]
Paradox #1
The verse in question involves taking possessions and goods after a conquest. A potential contradiction could arise when compared to teachings in the New Testament, such as those of Jesus, who emphasizes love, forgiveness, and turning the other cheek. This could be seen as inconsistent with actions involving taking goods by force.
Paradox #2
Deuteronomy 2:35 talks about Israelites taking plunder during their conquest, which can be inconsistent with other parts of the Bible that emphasize peace, mercy, and justice. This can create a conflict between the idea of war and violence versus the teachings of kindness and compassion found elsewhere in the Bible.
Paradox #3
This verse might be seen as conflicting with the broader moral teachings about mercy, compassion, or the value of human life. It describes taking possessions by force, which can seem at odds with messages about loving others and treating people with kindness.