Contradiction with Ezekiel 36:24-27
While Deuteronomy 31:16 predicts Israel's future disobedience and idolatry, Ezekiel 36:24-27 promises a future where God will gather Israel, cleanse them from idolatry, and instill obedience in them through a new heart and spirit.
Ezekiel 36:24-27: For I will take you from among the heathen, and gather you out of all countries, and will bring you into your own land.
Contradiction with Hebrews 8:10-12
Deuteronomy 31:16 speaks of the Israelites forsaking God, while Hebrews 8:10-12 describes a new covenant where God will write His laws on their hearts and remember their sins no more, ensuring their faithfulness.
Hebrews 8:10-12: For this [is] the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, saith the Lord; I will put my laws into their mind, and write them in their hearts: and I will be to them a God, and they shall be to me a people: [put: Gr. give] [in: or, upon]
Contradiction with Jeremiah 31:31-34
Deuteronomy 31:16 warns of Israel's unfaithfulness, whereas Jeremiah 31:31-34 promises a new covenant where God's laws are internalized, leading to steadfast fidelity.
Jeremiah 31:31-34: Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel, and with the house of Judah:
Contradiction with Isaiah 54:7-10
Deuteronomy 31:16 foretells of the Israelites' abandonment of God, but Isaiah 54:7-10 speaks of God's unfailing love and compassion, ensuring an everlasting covenant of peace despite brief moments of forsaking.
Isaiah 54:7-10: For a small moment have I forsaken thee; but with great mercies will I gather thee.
Contradiction with Hosea 2:19-20
While Deuteronomy 31:16 predicts Israel's waywardness, Hosea 2:19-20 portrays God's ultimate betrothal to Israel in faithfulness, showcasing a future reconciliation.
Hosea 2:19-20: And I will betroth thee unto me for ever; yea, I will betroth thee unto me in righteousness, and in judgment, and in lovingkindness, and in mercies.
Paradox #1
Deuteronomy 31:16 can be seen as presenting a theological conflict when considering the concept of free will versus God’s foreknowledge. The verse describes God informing Moses that the Israelites will turn away from Him and worship other gods after Moses' death. This could raise questions about human free will since it suggests that God already knows the Israelites' future decisions, leading to a debate about whether their actions are predetermined or if they still have the freedom to choose differently.
Paradox #2
Deuteronomy 31:16 discusses the prediction that the Israelites would turn away from God and worship other gods after Moses's death. A potential doctrinal conflict here might arise with the idea of free will versus predestination. On one hand, the text suggests a predetermined future where the Israelites will stray, which could imply that their actions are fixed and inevitable. On the other hand, the concept of free will in biblical teachings emphasizes that individuals have the choice to follow God or not. Balancing these two ideas can lead to differing interpretations and potential contradictions in understanding the nature of human choice and divine foresight.
Paradox #3
Deuteronomy 31:16 could present a contradiction in the sense that it foretells disobedience and turning away from God, which might seem to challenge the idea of free will. If this disobedience is predicted, it could imply a predetermined course of action, raising questions about human responsibility and choice.