Contradiction with Matthew 5:17
Deuteronomy 31:28 calls for a gathering to hear all the laws, suggesting their continued relevance, whereas Matthew 5:17 states that Jesus comes to fulfill the law, implying a shift or completion.
Matthew 5:17: Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.
Contradiction with Romans 10:4
Deuteronomy 31:28 speaks of the law as a guiding principle, while Romans 10:4 presents Christ as the end of the law for righteousness, suggesting the law is no longer the primary guide.
Romans 10:4: For Christ [is] the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
Contradiction with Hebrews 8:13
Deuteronomy 31:28 highlights the importance of the law, but Hebrews 8:13 declares the first covenant obsolete, indicating a contrast in the role of the law.
Hebrews 8:13: In that he saith, A new [covenant], he hath made the first old. Now that which decayeth and waxeth old [is] ready to vanish away.