Contradiction with Leviticus 26:8
This verse describes how five shall chase a hundred, and a hundred shall put ten thousand to flight, indicating victory and strength, in contrast to Deuteronomy 32:30 where a few conquer many due to disfavor.
Leviticus 26:8: And five of you shall chase an hundred, and an hundred of you shall put ten thousand to flight: and your enemies shall fall before you by the sword.
Contradiction with Judges 7:2
God reduces Gideon's army to show that victory does not depend on numbers, suggesting success comes from divine aid, contrasting with Deuteronomy 32:30's implication of defeat due to lack of divine support.
Judges 7:2: And the LORD said unto Gideon, The people that [are] with thee [are] too many for me to give the Midianites into their hands, lest Israel vaunt themselves against me, saying, Mine own hand hath saved me.
Contradiction with 1 Samuel 14:6
Jonathan expresses faith that the Lord can save by many or by few, implying trust in divine intervention, unlike in Deuteronomy 32:30 where the lack of such support results in defeat.
1 Samuel 14:6: And Jonathan said to the young man that bare his armour, Come, and let us go over unto the garrison of these uncircumcised: it may be that the LORD will work for us: for [there is] no restraint to the LORD to save by many or by few.
Contradiction with 2 Chronicles 14:11
Asa calls upon God for help against a vast army, emphasizing that victory is not determined by numbers if God is with them, contrary to Deuteronomy 32:30's situation of defeat.
2 Chronicles 14:11: And Asa cried unto the LORD his God, and said, LORD, [it is] nothing with thee to help, whether with many, or with them that have no power: help us, O LORD our God; for we rest on thee, and in thy name we go against this multitude. O LORD, thou [art] our God; let not man prevail against thee. [man: or, mortal man]
Contradiction with Psalm 33:16-17
These verses state that a king is not saved by a large army, underscoring reliance on God rather than numbers, as opposed to those fleeing in Deuteronomy 32:30 without God's help.
Psalm 33:16-17: There is no king saved by the multitude of an host: a mighty man is not delivered by much strength.
Paradox #1
Deuteronomy 32:30 might present a theological inconsistency in terms of understanding the balance between divine intervention and human effort. It suggests a scenario where a small number of people could overpower a much larger group, which could appear contradictory to common sense or natural ability, indicating a reliance on divine power rather than human strength or strategy. This could raise questions about when and how divine intervention occurs and why it doesn't always seem consistent in similar situations.
Paradox #2
One potential contradiction or inconsistency with Deuteronomy 32:30 could relate to the idea of how a small number of people could defeat a much larger group, especially if not all historical accounts support this kind of outcome in ancient battles. This could raise questions about the accuracy or literal interpretation of such events.
Paradox #3
Deuteronomy 32:30 can suggest the idea that a few people can defeat many because of divine intervention, which might conflict with the belief in fairness or equal effort leading to equal results. This could raise questions about why divine help isn't available equally to everyone.
Paradox #4
The contradiction in Deuteronomy 32:30 might arise from the idea that one person could chase a thousand and two could put ten thousand to flight, which seems mathematically inconsistent because you would expect two people to chase two thousand, not ten thousand. The numbers given do not follow a straightforward multiplication pattern.