Contradiction with Isaiah 44:9
Isaiah 44:9 states that those who make idols are nothing and their cherished images are worthless, contradicting Deuteronomy 32:38 which suggests that people might rely on idols.
Isaiah 44:9: They that make a graven image [are] all of them vanity; and their delectable things shall not profit; and they [are] their own witnesses; they see not, nor know; that they may be ashamed. [delectable: Heb. desirable]
Contradiction with Psalm 115:4-5
Psalm 115:4-5 emphasizes that idols are made by human hands and cannot speak, see, or hear, challenging the notion in Deuteronomy 32:38 that idols could provide help or support.
Psalm 115:4-5: Their idols [are] silver and gold, the work of men's hands.
Contradiction with Jeremiah 10:5
Jeremiah 10:5 describes idols as scarecrows in a cucumber field, unable to speak or move, contrary to the implication in Deuteronomy 32:38 that gods made by human hands could offer sustenance.
Jeremiah 10:5: They [are] upright as the palm tree, but speak not: they must needs be borne, because they cannot go. Be not afraid of them; for they cannot do evil, neither also [is it] in them to do good.
Paradox #1
Deuteronomy 32:38 might raise questions because it references gods that cannot save people, which could be seen as inconsistent with the emphasis on the power and sovereignty of the one true God in the Bible. This could be viewed as highlighting the futility of relying on other gods, which could cause tension for those interpreting it within the context of God's omnipotence.
Paradox #2
The contradiction or conflict in that verse could involve the idea of idolatry versus monotheism. The verse could be interpreted as highlighting a contrast between the one true God and other gods that people might worship, which goes against the central biblical principle of worshipping only God. This can be seen as inconsistent when people rely on these false gods for protection or provision, which goes against the commandment of monotheism.
Paradox #3
Deuteronomy 32:38 makes a reference to other gods who cannot save or help, implying criticism of the followers of these gods. The contradiction or conflict here could be between the monotheistic belief in one true God, as emphasized in the Bible, and the historical presence of various polytheistic cultures around ancient Israel, each worshipping multiple gods. This verse highlights the tension between monotheistic practices and the surrounding polytheistic traditions.
Paradox #4
Deuteronomy 32:38 might suggest a contradiction because it highlights the people's reliance on other gods to whom they had turned for protection and aid. This can conflict with the core biblical teaching of exclusive devotion and faithfulness to one God. It could be seen as highlighting the inconsistency of worshiping multiple deities while expecting ultimate support and salvation from the God of Israel.