Contradiction with 1 John 4:8
Emphasizes that God is love, which contradicts the notion of God wounding and healing in Deuteronomy 32:39.
1 John 4:8: He that loveth not knoweth not God; for God is love.
Contradiction with James 1:13
States that God cannot be tempted with evil, neither tempteth he any man, which contrasts with the active role of God in causing harm mentioned in Deuteronomy 32:39.
James 1:13: Let no man say when he is tempted, I am tempted of God: for God cannot be tempted with evil, neither tempteth he any man: [evil: or, evils]
Contradiction with 1 Corinthians 14:33
Declares God as not the author of confusion but of peace, contrasting with the destructive and healing actions attributed to God in Deuteronomy 32:39.
1 Corinthians 14:33: For God is not [the author] of confusion, but of peace, as in all churches of the saints. [confusion: Gr. tumult, or, unquietness]
Contradiction with 2 Peter 3:9
Indicates that God is patient and not willing that any should perish, which is at odds with the destructive aspect seen in Deuteronomy 32:39.
2 Peter 3:9: The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.
Paradox #1
Deuteronomy 32:39 might conflict with beliefs about the nature of God in terms of free will and suffering. The verse suggests that God directly controls life and death, which can be seen as conflicting with the idea that humans have free choice and that suffering is a result of that freedom, rather than direct divine intervention.
Paradox #2
Deuteronomy 32:39 describes God's power over life and death, asserting that He alone has control over these aspects. A possible doctrinal tension could arise when comparing this idea with the concept of free will or human agency found elsewhere in the Bible. Some interpretations emphasize human responsibility in making choices and their outcomes, which might seem in contrast to the idea of God having ultimate control over life and death decisions.
Paradox #3
Deuteronomy 32:39 speaks of God's unique power over life and death. A contradiction could arise when comparing this with other ancient beliefs where numerous gods shared these powers. This verse emphasizes monotheism, which can conflict with polytheistic traditions of neighboring cultures in history.
Paradox #4
Deuteronomy 32:39 expresses the idea that God is in control of life and death, healing and harming. The contradiction or conflict might be the challenge of understanding why a loving and omnipotent God would allow harm or suffering. It raises questions about the coexistence of God's benevolence and the presence of pain and evil in the world.