Contradiction with Matthew 5:44
This verse teaches to love your enemies and bless them that curse you, contradicting the vengeance depicted in Deuteronomy 32:42.
Matthew 5:44: But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;
Contradiction with Romans 12:19
This verse says not to avenge yourselves and leave room for God's wrath, contrasting with the active vengeance described in Deuteronomy 32:42.
Romans 12:19: Dearly beloved, avenge not yourselves, but [rather] give place unto wrath: for it is written, Vengeance [is] mine; I will repay, saith the Lord.
Contradiction with Proverbs 25:21-22
These verses advise feeding your enemy if he is hungry, opposing the violent retribution mentioned in Deuteronomy 32:42.
Proverbs 25:21-22: If thine enemy be hungry, give him bread to eat; and if he be thirsty, give him water to drink:
Contradiction with Luke 6:27
This verse instructs to do good to those who hate you, which contradicts the notion of avenging bloodshed in Deuteronomy 32:42.
Luke 6:27: But I say unto you which hear, Love your enemies, do good to them which hate you,
Contradiction with 1 Peter 3:9
This verse advises against repaying evil for evil, contrary to the retribution depicted in Deuteronomy 32:42.
1 Peter 3:9: Not rendering evil for evil, or railing for railing: but contrariwise blessing; knowing that ye are thereunto called, that ye should inherit a blessing.
Paradox #1
Deuteronomy 32:42 speaks about God’s wrath and vengeance. This portrayal of a violent, vengeful God might seem to conflict with the New Testament depiction of God as loving and forgiving, as represented in the teachings of Jesus. This can create tension or confusion for those trying to reconcile these different aspects of God’s character within the Bible.
Paradox #2
Deuteronomy 32:42 talks about a violent and vengeful response towards enemies. Some people see a contradiction with other messages in the Bible that promote peace, forgiveness, and love for enemies, such as teachings from Jesus in the New Testament. This can be seen as inconsistent since it suggests differing attitudes toward handling conflicts.
Paradox #3
Deuteronomy 32:42 could be seen as morally contradictory because it describes God as taking violent action against enemies, which might conflict with other biblical teachings that promote peace, love, and forgiveness. This can create tension between the idea of a loving, merciful God and the depiction of divine retribution and violence.