Contradiction with Matthew 5:17
This verse, where Jesus says He came to fulfill the Law, suggests continuity rather than destruction, whereas Deuteronomy 4:3 speaks of punishment and destruction for disobedience.
Matthew 5:17: Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.
Contradiction with Deuteronomy 32:39
This verse emphasizes God's sovereignty over life and death, seemingly contradicting the active punishment role seen in Deuteronomy 4:3.
Deuteronomy 32:39: See now that I, [even] I, [am] he, and [there is] no god with me: I kill, and I make alive; I wound, and I heal: neither [is there any] that can deliver out of my hand.
Contradiction with 1 Samuel 15:29
Suggests God's steadfastness and lack of change, which could contrast the destructive action seen in Deuteronomy 4:3.
1 Samuel 15:29: And also the Strength of Israel will not lie nor repent: for he [is] not a man, that he should repent. [Strength: or, Eternity, or, Victory]
Paradox #1
The contradiction in Deuteronomy 4:3 might relate to inconsistencies with other biblical accounts concerning the events at Baal Peor, such as the differing details in the book of Numbers. The accounts might not align perfectly in terms of numbers, actions, or specific events, leading to potential confusion about what exactly occurred.
Paradox #2
A potential contradiction or conflict could arise from the destruction and punishment aspect of the verse, which might seem at odds with the broader biblical themes of forgiveness and mercy. People may struggle with understanding how justice is applied and why some are punished while forgiveness is a central teaching elsewhere in the Bible.