Contradiction with Mark 2:27
Jesus states, "The sabbath was made for man, and not man for the sabbath," suggesting a more flexible approach to Sabbath observance.
Mark 2:27: And he said unto them, The sabbath was made for man, and not man for the sabbath:
Contradiction with John 5:16-17
Jesus defends His actions on the Sabbath, implying certain works are permissible, which can be seen as conflicting with strict rest.
John 5:16-17: And therefore did the Jews persecute Jesus, and sought to slay him, because he had done these things on the sabbath day.
Contradiction with Colossians 2:16
Paul implies that Sabbath observance is a matter of personal conviction and not binding, which contrasts with the strict observance commanded in Deuteronomy 5:14.
Colossians 2:16: Let no man therefore judge you in meat, or in drink, or in respect of an holyday, or of the new moon, or of the sabbath [days]: [in meat...: or, for eating and drinking] [respect: or, part]
Paradox #1
Deuteronomy 5:14 talks about keeping the Sabbath day as a day of rest. A theological inconsistency arises when comparing this command with how Jesus and His disciples are depicted in the New Testament, particularly in the Gospels, where they sometimes perform certain activities on the Sabbath that were controversial at the time. This can lead to discussions about how strictly the Sabbath laws should be interpreted and followed, bringing up potential conflicts between Old Testament laws and New Testament practices.
Paradox #2
Deuteronomy 5:14 talks about keeping the Sabbath day as a day of rest. A contradiction might be that while this commandment calls for rest, historical records and other parts of the Bible show instances where people did not adhere strictly to this rule for various reasons, like agricultural demands or military activities. This creates an inconsistency between what was commanded and what was practiced.
Paradox #3
Deuteronomy 5:14 talks about observing the Sabbath rest for everyone, including servants and animals. The contradiction or conflict could be seen in how some interpret or apply this command differently today. While the verse advocates for rest and equality, historically and sometimes currently, not all workers or animals may receive a day of rest, raising questions about fairness and consistency in upholding such principles.