Contradiction with Romans 3:20
This verse indicates that no one will be justified by the works of the law, contradicting the idea that keeping the commandments leads to good for us.
Romans 3:20: Therefore by the deeds of the law there shall no flesh be justified in his sight: for by the law [is] the knowledge of sin.
Contradiction with Galatians 3:13
This verse states that Christ has redeemed us from the curse of the law, implying that following the law is not necessary for our protection or prosperity.
Galatians 3:13: Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of the law, being made a curse for us: for it is written, Cursed [is] every one that hangeth on a tree:
Contradiction with Hebrews 8:13
This verse suggests that the old covenant, including the commandments, is obsolete, in contrast to the notion in Deuteronomy that keeping them is beneficial.
Hebrews 8:13: In that he saith, A new [covenant], he hath made the first old. Now that which decayeth and waxeth old [is] ready to vanish away.
Contradiction with Romans 7:6
This indicates that we are delivered from the law and should serve in newness of spirit, which contradicts the idea of observing commandments for our good.
Romans 7:6: But now we are delivered from the law, that being dead wherein we were held; that we should serve in newness of spirit, and not [in] the oldness of the letter. [that being...: or, being dead to that]
Contradiction with Galatians 5:18
This verse states that if you are led by the Spirit, you are not under the law, challenging Deuteronomy 6:24's emphasis on the law for protection.
Galatians 5:18: But if ye be led of the Spirit, ye are not under the law.
Paradox #1
Deuteronomy 6:24 emphasizes following commandments for well-being and survival. A possible contradiction could be the difficulty in reconciling strict adherence to rules with the concept of free will. Some people might see this as potentially conflicting with the idea of making personal moral choices rather than following prescribed rules.