Contradiction with Romans 3:20
This verse states that no one will be justified by the deeds of the law, contradicting the idea of righteousness through law as stated in Deuteronomy 6:25.
Romans 3:20: Therefore by the deeds of the law there shall no flesh be justified in his sight: for by the law [is] the knowledge of sin.
Contradiction with Galatians 2:16
It emphasizes that a person is not justified by the works of the law but by faith in Jesus Christ, opposing the concept of law-based righteousness in Deuteronomy 6:25.
Galatians 2:16: Knowing that a man is not justified by the works of the law, but by the faith of Jesus Christ, even we have believed in Jesus Christ, that we might be justified by the faith of Christ, and not by the works of the law: for by the works of the law shall no flesh be justified.
Contradiction with Hebrews 7:19
This verse indicates that the law made nothing perfect, suggesting that adherence to the law does not equate to righteousness, unlike Deuteronomy 6:25.
Hebrews 7:19: For the law made nothing perfect, but the bringing in of a better hope [did]; by the which we draw nigh unto God. [the bringing...: or, it was the bringing in]
Contradiction with Ezekiel 18:21
It shows that turning away from sin and doing lawful actions is linked to living, yet the emphasis is on turning from evil, not on the law itself for righteousness.
Ezekiel 18:21: But if the wicked will turn from all his sins that he hath committed, and keep all my statutes, and do that which is lawful and right, he shall surely live, he shall not die.
Contradiction with Philippians 3:9
It emphasizes righteousness by faith rather than law, contrasting with the Deuteronomy 6:25 notion of righteousness through law obedience.
Philippians 3:9: And be found in him, not having mine own righteousness, which is of the law, but that which is through the faith of Christ, the righteousness which is of God by faith:
Contradiction with Titus 3:5
This verse states that salvation is not by works of righteousness, which diverges from the idea of achieving righteousness through following the law as in Deuteronomy 6:25.
Titus 3:5: Not by works of righteousness which we have done, but according to his mercy he saved us, by the washing of regeneration, and renewing of the Holy Ghost;
Contradiction with Romans 10:4
It claims Christ is the end of the law for righteousness, which contradicts the notion that the law itself provides righteousness as per Deuteronomy 6:25.
Romans 10:4: For Christ [is] the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
Paradox #1
Deuteronomy 6:25 might seem to suggest that righteousness comes from following the law, which could appear to conflict with the idea in some parts of the New Testament that righteousness comes through faith and grace, not just by following laws. This contrast could be seen as a theological tension between faith and works in attaining righteousness.
Paradox #2
Deuteronomy 6:25 talks about righteousness being achieved by following the commandments. This could seem inconsistent with New Testament teachings, like those of Paul in Romans, where righteousness is described as coming from faith, not just following the law. This might appear as a contradiction between the role of law and faith in achieving righteousness.
Paradox #3
Deuteronomy 6:25 talks about following the commandments leading to righteousness. A contradiction or inconsistency might arise when comparing this to New Testament teachings, like those of Paul, who suggests that righteousness is achieved through faith rather than just following the law. This could create a conflict between the Old Testament emphasis on law and the New Testament focus on faith.
Paradox #4
Deuteronomy 6:25 could present a contradiction if viewed in the context of relying solely on following laws for righteousness. This might conflict with other teachings in the Bible that emphasize faith and grace over strict adherence to laws for achieving righteousness or salvation. This could create tension between legalism and faith in different parts of the Bible.