Contradiction with Matthew 5:44
This verse advocates loving enemies and praying for those who persecute, which contradicts the instruction to utterly destroy enemies without mercy.
Matthew 5:44: But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;
Contradiction with Romans 12:14
This verse encourages blessing and not cursing enemies, opposing the directive to show no mercy and destroy.
Romans 12:14: Bless them which persecute you: bless, and curse not.
Contradiction with Proverbs 25:21
This verse advises feeding and giving drink to enemies, contradicting the command to utterly destroy without mercy.
Proverbs 25:21: If thine enemy be hungry, give him bread to eat; and if he be thirsty, give him water to drink:
Contradiction with Luke 6:27
This verse instructs to love and do good to enemies, which contrasts with the order to smite and show no mercy.
Luke 6:27: But I say unto you which hear, Love your enemies, do good to them which hate you,
Contradiction with Romans 12:19
This verse instructs not to take vengeance, leaving it to God, contrasting with the command to destroy enemies.
Romans 12:19: Dearly beloved, avenge not yourselves, but [rather] give place unto wrath: for it is written, Vengeance [is] mine; I will repay, saith the Lord.
Contradiction with Proverbs 24:17
This verse advises not rejoicing when enemies fall, conflicting with the instruction towards complete exaction against enemies.
Proverbs 24:17: Rejoice not when thine enemy falleth, and let not thine heart be glad when he stumbleth:
Contradiction with Matthew 5:39
This verse encourages turning the other cheek instead of retaliating, opposing the approach of utterly destroying.
Matthew 5:39: But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also.
Paradox #1
Deuteronomy 7:2 could be seen as conflicting with the idea of God's mercy and love, as it involves instructions about complete destruction of other nations, which can seem harsh and unforgiving. This might appear inconsistent with other teachings in the Bible that emphasize compassion and loving one's neighbor.
Paradox #2
The contradiction or inconsistency with Deuteronomy 7:2 might arise when comparing it to teachings about love, forgiveness, and peace found in other parts of the Bible, particularly in the New Testament. The verse involves instructions for dealing with other nations during ancient times, but this can be seen as conflicting with the message of loving enemies and turning the other cheek, as taught by Jesus.
Paradox #3
The contradiction or conflict with that verse could relate to the issue of morality and ethics. The verse deals with the command to completely destroy certain nations, which raises questions about its ethical implications and how it aligns with the broader messages of peace, love, and forgiveness found elsewhere in religious texts. This presents a challenge when viewed through modern perspectives on morality and human rights.
Paradox #4
Deuteronomy 7:2 involves instructions for warfare and the destruction of certain groups, which some people might find inconsistent with modern ethical views on peace and human rights. It can conflict with the idea of universal compassion and coexistence accepted in contemporary society.
Paradox #5
The potential contradiction in this verse is about the command to completely destroy other nations without mercy. This conflicts with other teachings in the Bible that promote love, compassion, and forgiveness. It raises questions about how to reconcile this instruction with the broader message of treating others with kindness and understanding.