Contradiction with Proverbs 3:5
This verse advises people to trust in the Lord and not their own understanding, whereas Deuteronomy 9:4 warns against self-righteousness by reminding that their victory is not due to their own righteousness.
Proverbs 3:5: Trust in the LORD with all thine heart; and lean not unto thine own understanding.
Contradiction with Matthew 23:12
This verse suggests that those who exalt themselves will be humbled, which contradicts the idea of claiming righteousness as a basis for triumph mentioned in Deuteronomy 9:4.
Matthew 23:12: And whosoever shall exalt himself shall be abased; and he that shall humble himself shall be exalted.
Contradiction with Isaiah 64:6
This verse indicates that all our righteous acts are like filthy rags, contradicting any belief in personal righteousness as a merit for divine favor seen in Deuteronomy 9:4.
Isaiah 64:6: But we are all as an unclean [thing], and all our righteousnesses [are] as filthy rags; and we all do fade as a leaf; and our iniquities, like the wind, have taken us away.
Contradiction with Romans 3:10
This verse states that none is righteous, no, not one, contradicting any implication of righteousness being a factor in God's favor in Deuteronomy 9:4.
Romans 3:10: As it is written, There is none righteous, no, not one:
Contradiction with Ephesians 2:8-9
These verses highlight that salvation is by grace through faith, not a result of personal works or righteousness, contradicting a self-righteous interpretation of Deuteronomy 9:4.
Ephesians 2:8-9: For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: [it is] the gift of God:
Paradox #1
The verse might seem to conflict with the idea that humans always succeed because of their own merits and righteousness. It suggests that success isn't due to personal righteousness but is part of a larger divine plan. This could appear inconsistent with other parts of the Bible that emphasize the importance of personal righteousness and good deeds.
Paradox #2
The potential contradiction in Deuteronomy 9:4 could relate to the concepts of divine justice versus human merit. This verse suggests that God is driving out nations not because of the righteousness of the Israelites, but because of the wickedness of those nations. This could be seen as conflicting with other parts of scripture that emphasize rewards based on personal righteousness and merits. The balance between God's sovereign choice and human behavior might seem inconsistent.
Paradox #3
The contradiction related to the given verse could be the idea that it suggests the Israelites are receiving the land not because of their own righteousness but due to the wickedness of the current inhabitants. This can be seen as conflicting with other parts of the Bible that emphasize the importance of following God's laws and being righteous to receive blessings. It may create an inconsistency in understanding why the Israelites were chosen or granted certain lands.
Paradox #4
The contradiction in this verse might be seen in the idea that although people receive a reward or benefit, it is not because of their own righteousness or good behavior, but rather because of the wrongdoing of others. This can raise questions about fairness, as it seems to reward people not based on their own actions but rather on the actions of others.