Contradiction with Luke 12:15
This verse warns against covetousness and finds life's value not in the abundance of possessions, while Ecclesiastes 2:7 reflects a sense of pride in material wealth and servants.
Luke 12:15: And he said unto them, Take heed, and beware of covetousness: for a man's life consisteth not in the abundance of the things which he possesseth.
Contradiction with Matthew 6:19-21
These verses advise storing treasures in heaven rather than on earth, contrasting with Ecclesiastes 2:7’s focus on earthly wealth and possessions.
Matthew 6:19-21: Lay not up for yourselves treasures upon earth, where moth and rust doth corrupt, and where thieves break through and steal:
Contradiction with 1 Timothy 6:7-8
These verses emphasize contentment with basic needs and reject dependence on wealth, whereas Ecclesiastes 2:7 highlights the accumulation of possessions and wealth.
1 Timothy 6:7-8: For we brought nothing into [this] world, [and it is] certain we can carry nothing out.
Contradiction with Proverbs 11:4
This verse suggests that riches do not profit in the day of wrath, contrasting with Ecclesiastes 2:7’s implication of security in wealth.
Proverbs 11:4: Riches profit not in the day of wrath: but righteousness delivereth from death.
Contradiction with Mark 10:21-22
Jesus’ advice to a rich man to sell his possessions for treasure in heaven conflicts with Ecclesiastes 2:7’s pride in earthly wealth and status.
Mark 10:21-22: Then Jesus beholding him loved him, and said unto him, One thing thou lackest: go thy way, sell whatsoever thou hast, and give to the poor, and thou shalt have treasure in heaven: and come, take up the cross, and follow me.
Paradox #1
Ecclesiastes 2:7 might raise questions when compared to other parts of the Bible that discuss equality and the value of every individual, such as Galatians 3:28, which emphasizes that all people are equal in Christ. The verse in Ecclesiastes might seem to suggest that owning or possessing people can lead to happiness or success, potentially conflicting with these teachings on equality and human worth.
Paradox #2
Historical contradictions or conflicts regarding this verse may arise from its mention of owning slaves. Some readers see a contradiction with the values of equality and freedom found elsewhere in religious teachings. Others might find it inconsistent with modern moral views on human rights. This reflects historical cultural practices that differ from today's standards.
Paradox #3
The contradiction could be seen in the acceptance of owning slaves, which conflicts with the broader biblical principles of love, equality, and treating others as you would want to be treated. This presents an inconsistency as the ownership of slaves goes against the idea of respecting every individual's freedom and dignity.