Ecclesiastes 4:9 Contradictions and Paradoxes

According to the author of Ecclesiastes, it's better for two people to work together because they can help each other and do a better job. When they team up, they can get more done and earn a bigger reward.

Contradiction with Galatians 6:5

Emphasizes individual responsibility by stating that every person should bear their own burden, whereas Ecclesiastes 4:9 highlights the benefits of partnership.

Galatians 6:5: For every man shall bear his own burden.

Contradiction with Proverbs 18:1

Suggests that a person who isolates themselves seeks their own desires, implying potential benefits of independence, contrasting the idea of working together in Ecclesiastes 4:9.

Proverbs 18:1: Through desire a man, having separated himself, seeketh [and] intermeddleth with all wisdom. [Through...: or, He that separateth himself seeketh according to his desire, and intermeddleth in every business]

Contradiction with 1 Corinthians 7:8

Suggests it is good for people to remain unmarried, which could imply being alone, whereas Ecclesiastes 4:9 suggests two are better than one for productivity and support.

1 Corinthians 7:8: I say therefore to the unmarried and widows, It is good for them if they abide even as I.

Contradiction with Matthew 6:6

Advises praying in solitude, highlighting individual spirituality, which can contradict the idea of the advantages of companionship stated in Ecclesiastes 4:9.

Matthew 6:6: But thou, when thou prayest, enter into thy closet, and when thou hast shut thy door, pray to thy Father which is in secret; and thy Father which seeth in secret shall reward thee openly.

Contradiction with Jeremiah 15:17

Reflects on being alone and not part of the assembly, showing a stance that could contrast with the benefits of companionship suggested in Ecclesiastes 4:9.

Jeremiah 15:17: I sat not in the assembly of the mockers, nor rejoiced; I sat alone because of thy hand: for thou hast filled me with indignation.

Paradox #1