Contradiction with Matthew 5:17
This verse states that Jesus did not come to destroy the law, but to fulfill it, which contrasts with Ephesians 2:15 suggesting the abolishment of the law of commandments.
Matthew 5:17: Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.
Contradiction with Romans 3:31
This verse emphasizes establishing the law through faith, which seems to contradict Ephesians 2:15's notion of abolishing the law.
Romans 3:31: Do we then make void the law through faith? God forbid: yea, we establish the law.
Paradox #1
One possible contradiction with "Ephesians 2:15" is the interpretation regarding the Law. Some readers might see a conflict between this verse and other parts of the Bible that emphasize the importance and permanence of the Law, particularly in the Old Testament. While Ephesians suggests a breaking down of certain legal boundaries, other scriptures advocate for the Law's continued relevance, leading to differing views on how Christians should relate to Old Testament laws.
Paradox #2
Ephesians 2:15 might seem to contradict other parts of the Bible where the law is portrayed as important and enduring, like in the Old Testament or in places where Jesus explains the importance of the law. The difficulty arises in understanding how the law is both fulfilled and still valuable in guiding moral and ethical behavior. Some people may see this as conflicting messages about whether the law is abolished or still has a role.
Paradox #3
Ephesians 2:15 talks about breaking down barriers between Jews and Gentiles to create unity. A historical inconsistency might be that this idea of unity contrasts with earlier Jewish laws in the Old Testament that set Jews apart to follow specific rules. This creates tension between adhering to traditional laws and embracing new teachings of inclusivity in early Christianity.
Paradox #4
Ephesians 2:15 can be seen as presenting a contradiction or inconsistency because it talks about abolishing certain laws or commandments to create unity and peace. Some people might see this as conflicting with the idea that all biblical laws are important and should be followed strictly. This could lead to confusion about which laws are essential and which ones can be set aside for a greater good, such as peace or unity.