Contradiction with Matthew 5:39
Esther 10:1 speaks of imposing a tribute, suggesting the use of power and authority, while Matthew 5:39 advises against resisting evil and encourages turning the other cheek, suggesting a different approach to handling power.
Matthew 5:39: But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also.
Contradiction with Romans 13:6-7
Esther 10:1 describes a king imposing taxes, which might imply a burden; Romans 13:6-7 emphasizes paying taxes as a duty to authorities, highlighting the legitimacy and positive aspect of such impositions.
Romans 13:6-7: For for this cause pay ye tribute also: for they are God's ministers, attending continually upon this very thing.
Contradiction with Matthew 22:21
Esther 10:1 involves the demand for tribute, potentially seen as oppressive; Matthew 22:21 emphasizes rendering to Caesar what is Caesar's, distinguishing between civil duty and spiritual obligations.
Matthew 22:21: When they had heard [these words], they marvelled, and left him, and went their way.
Contradiction with Proverbs 3:9
Where Esther 10:1 mentions tribute imposed by a king, possibly seen as burdensome, Proverbs 3:9 advises honoring the Lord with your wealth, implying voluntary giving as opposed to imposed tribute.
Proverbs 3:9: Honour the LORD with thy substance, and with the firstfruits of all thine increase:
Contradiction with Mark 12:17
Esther 10:1 depicts a forceful action of imposing tribute, while Mark 12:17 suggests the principle of giving to authorities what belongs to them, promoting a sense of just and rightful contribution.
Mark 12:17: And Jesus answering said unto them, Render to Caesar the things that are Caesar's, and to God the things that are God's. And they marvelled at him.