Contradiction with Matthew 6:17-18
This verse instructs not to make fasting visible to others, while Esther 4:16 speaks of a collective, visible fast.
Matthew 6:17-18: But thou, when thou fastest, anoint thine head, and wash thy face;
Contradiction with Matthew 5:44
This verse instructs to love enemies, but Esther 4:16 is in the context of opposing adversaries.
Matthew 5:44: But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;
Contradiction with Romans 13:1-2
This verse emphasizes submission to governing authorities, whereas Esther 4:16 involves defying a royal edict for self-preservation.
Romans 13:1-2: Let every soul be subject unto the higher powers. For there is no power but of God: the powers that be are ordained of God. [ordained: or, ordered]
Contradiction with Proverbs 3:5
Encourages reliance on God alone, while Esther 4:16 involves seeking human intervention through fasting.
Proverbs 3:5: Trust in the LORD with all thine heart; and lean not unto thine own understanding.
Contradiction with Matthew 26:52
Advises against taking up arms, yet Esther 4:16 involves preparing for defensive action.
Matthew 26:52: Thinkest thou that I cannot now pray to my Father, and he shall presently give me more than twelve legions of angels?
Paradox #1
Esther 4:16 involves Esther's decision to approach the king without being summoned, which was against the law and could result in death. The potential doctrinal conflict arises between following laws of the land and acting on faith or divine command. Some might see a conflict between obeying human authority versus taking action based on spiritual or moral conviction.
Paradox #2
One possible contradiction or inconsistency related to Esther 4:16 could be the portrayal of fasting without explicitly mentioning prayer. In the Jewish tradition, fasting is often accompanied by prayer, yet the verse in Esther focuses solely on fasting. This has led some scholars to question why the text omits any reference to prayer, which would typically be expected in a context of seeking divine intervention and guidance.
Paradox #3
The potential contradiction in this verse could be seen in the idea of asking others to join a dangerous action while being in a position of relative safety. It might be seen as inconsistent for someone to encourage others to risk their lives while they themselves are protected. However, in the context of the story, this action can be interpreted as an act of solidarity and bravery.