Contradiction with Matthew 5:39
While Esther 8:11 permits Jews to defend themselves by destroying their enemies, Matthew 5:39 advises turning the other cheek and not resisting evil.
Matthew 5:39: But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also.
Contradiction with Romans 12:17
Esther 8:11 allows retaliation and taking action against adversaries, whereas Romans 12:17 advises against repaying evil for evil.
Romans 12:17: Recompense to no man evil for evil. Provide things honest in the sight of all men.
Contradiction with Luke 6:27
Esther 8:11 enables taking vengeance on enemies, but Luke 6:27 urges loving one's enemies and doing good to those who hate you.
Luke 6:27: But I say unto you which hear, Love your enemies, do good to them which hate you,
Contradiction with Proverbs 25:21
Esther 8:11 endorses the Jews destroying their enemies, which conflicts with Proverbs 25:21's message to feed and give drink to one's enemy.
Proverbs 25:21: If thine enemy be hungry, give him bread to eat; and if he be thirsty, give him water to drink:
Contradiction with 1 Thessalonians 5:15
Esther 8:11 advocates for defense and destruction of foes, but 1 Thessalonians 5:15 teaches not to repay evil with evil, but to pursue good for all.
1 Thessalonians 5:15: See that none render evil for evil unto any [man]; but ever follow that which is good, both among yourselves, and to all [men].
Contradiction with Exodus 20:13
Esther 8:11 authorizes killing in self-defense, while Exodus 20:13 declares "Thou shalt not kill," advocating a general prohibition against taking life.
Exodus 20:13: Thou shalt not kill.
Contradiction with Matthew 5:44
Esther 8:11 allows preemptive defense against adversaries, whereas Matthew 5:44 asks believers to love their enemies and pray for those who persecute them.
Matthew 5:44: But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;
Paradox #1
The contradiction or conflict could be about the Bible promoting peace and love versus allowing violence and defense by force. In Esther 8:11, there is a permission for self-defense, which involves using force. This might seem inconsistent with other teachings in the Bible that emphasize turning the other cheek and loving one's enemies.
Paradox #2
The doctrinal conflict in Esther 8:11 could be the issue of violence and self-defense in biblical teachings. Some parts of the Bible teach peace and non-violence, while this verse allows for defensive violence. This could seem inconsistent with messages of turning the other cheek or loving your enemies found in other parts of scripture.
Paradox #3
The contradiction regarding Esther 8:11 might be about the moral and ethical implications of the decree allowing the Jews to defend themselves and attack their enemies. This could seem inconsistent with other biblical teachings that emphasize forgiveness or peace.
Paradox #4
Esther 8:11 could be seen as morally conflicting because it involves a decree allowing the Jews to defend themselves and potentially kill their enemies. Some might see a contradiction between this act of violence and other biblical teachings that promote peace and forgiveness. People might struggle with reconciling the idea of using violence for protection with the broader message of love and non-violence found in other parts of the Bible.