Contradiction with Matthew 5:44
Esther 9:13 speaks of vengeance and retribution, while Matthew 5:44 teaches love and prayer for enemies, highlighting a contradiction between seeking personal revenge and promoting forgiveness.
Matthew 5:44: But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;
Contradiction with Romans 12:19
Esther 9:13 shows humans taking vengeance into their own hands, whereas Romans 12:19 instructs to leave vengeance to God, underscoring a conflict between personal retribution and divine justice.
Romans 12:19: Dearly beloved, avenge not yourselves, but [rather] give place unto wrath: for it is written, Vengeance [is] mine; I will repay, saith the Lord.
Contradiction with Proverbs 24:17
Esther 9:13 involves the destruction of enemies, which contrasts with the guidance in Proverbs 24:17 to not rejoice when enemies fall, reflecting different attitudes toward adversaries’ downfall.
Proverbs 24:17: Rejoice not when thine enemy falleth, and let not thine heart be glad when he stumbleth:
Paradox #1
One possible contradiction in Esther 9:13 is the apparent conflict between the story's endorsement of violence and the broader biblical teachings on mercy and forgiveness. In the story, Esther requests further acts of vengeance, which might seem inconsistent with the general biblical theme of turning away from violence and instead practicing compassion and forgiveness towards enemies.
Paradox #2
The potential doctrinal conflict with Esther 9:13 might relate to the idea of revenge or retribution. Some people might see this as conflicting with New Testament teachings about forgiveness and turning the other cheek. The verse discusses actions taken by the Jews against their enemies, which might seem inconsistent with teachings about compassion and forgiveness found in other parts of the Bible.
Paradox #3
The contradiction or conflict in Esther 9:13 could relate to the ethical questions about justice and retribution. Some people see a contradiction in the scale of retribution requested in this part of the story, which might conflict with other biblical teachings about mercy or justice, leading to discussions on whether the actions were justified.
Paradox #4
The contradiction or conflict in Esther 9:13 can be seen in the request for violence and retribution against enemies, which might seem inconsistent with the broader themes of forgiveness and peace found elsewhere in religious teachings. This action could be viewed as perpetuating a cycle of violence rather than promoting reconciliation.