Contradiction with Genesis 1:3
God commands light into existence, contradicting the plague of darkness described in Exodus 10:22.
Genesis 1:3: And God said, Let there be light: and there was light.
Contradiction with John 1:5
The light shines in darkness, and darkness did not overcome it, contrasting the complete darkness experienced in Exodus 10:22.
John 1:5: And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not. [comprehended: or, did not admit, or, receive]
Contradiction with 1 John 1:5
God is light, and in him is no darkness at all, opposing the darkness covering Egypt in Exodus 10:22.
1 John 1:5: This then is the message which we have heard of him, and declare unto you, that God is light, and in him is no darkness at all.
Contradiction with Isaiah 60:19
The Lord shall be unto thee an everlasting light, conflicting with the temporary darkness in Exodus 10:22.
Isaiah 60:19: The sun shall be no more thy light by day; neither for brightness shall the moon give light unto thee: but the LORD shall be unto thee an everlasting light, and thy God thy glory.
Paradox #1
Some people find a contradiction in the event described because it talks about a thick darkness that could be felt, covering Egypt for three days. Critics argue that there is no natural explanation for such a phenomenon that aligns with historical or scientific records, suggesting it might not be plausible. However, others view it as a miraculous event beyond natural explanation.
Paradox #2
The contradiction in Exodus 10:22 could be related to the description of a period of complete darkness covering Egypt for three days. In reality, such an event affecting a specific region without affecting the surroundings is unlikely under natural explanations, since factors like weather patterns, astronomical phenomena, or volcanic eruptions might cause temporary darkness, but typically not with such precise boundaries or duration.
Paradox #3
Exodus 10:22 describes a plague of darkness over Egypt. A potential contradiction could be the idea of punishing an entire nation's population, including innocent individuals, for the decisions made by their ruler. This raises questions about collective punishment and the fairness of such actions.