Contradiction with Exodus 12:35-36
These verses talk about the Israelites borrowing from the Egyptians and leaving with their goods, implying they took more than just what they brought.
Exodus 12:35-36: And the children of Israel did according to the word of Moses; and they borrowed of the Egyptians jewels of silver, and jewels of gold, and raiment:
Contradiction with Exodus 12:38
This verse mentions a mixed multitude leaving with the Israelites, implying that not only Israelites left Egypt, but others as well.
Exodus 12:38: And a mixed multitude went up also with them; and flocks, and herds, [even] very much cattle. [a mixed...: Heb. a great mixture]
Contradiction with Exodus 20:15
This commandment against stealing contrasts with taking Egyptian goods during the Exodus.
Exodus 20:15: Thou shalt not steal.
Contradiction with Romans 13:7
Encourages paying dues, which contradicts taking the Egyptians' items as suggested in the broader context of the Exodus story.
Romans 13:7: Render therefore to all their dues: tribute to whom tribute [is due]; custom to whom custom; fear to whom fear; honour to whom honour.
Contradiction with Proverbs 3:27-28
Advises not to withhold good when it's in your power to act, contrasting with taking possessions from Egyptians.
Proverbs 3:27-28: Withhold not good from them to whom it is due, when it is in the power of thine hand to do [it]. [them...: Heb. the owners thereof]
Paradox #1
The potential moral conflict in Exodus 10:26 could stem from the context of the Israelites taking livestock from the Egyptians as part of their demands to leave Egypt. This could raise questions about fairness and justice, as it involves taking animals that belong to another group. Some might see this as contradictory to the concept of respecting others' property. However, it is important to consider the broader narrative and context in which this event occurs, as the story involves themes of liberation and divine intervention.