Contradiction with Matthew 18:22
While Exodus 10:28 depicts Pharaoh's harsh refusal to see Moses again, Matthew 18:22 emphasizes the importance of forgiveness and reconciliation, suggesting one should not limit interactions regardless of past grievances.
Matthew 18:22: Jesus saith unto him, I say not unto thee, Until seven times: but, Until seventy times seven.
Contradiction with Romans 12:20
Exodus 10:28 shows hostility between Pharaoh and Moses, whereas Romans 12:20 encourages kindness towards one's enemies, highlighting a stark contrast in approach.
Romans 12:20: Therefore if thine enemy hunger, feed him; if he thirst, give him drink: for in so doing thou shalt heap coals of fire on his head.
Contradiction with Proverbs 15:1
Exodus 10:28 conveys anger and finality, while Proverbs 15:1 advises a gentle response that turns away wrath, offering a conflicting perspective on handling confrontation.
Proverbs 15:1: A soft answer turneth away wrath: but grievous words stir up anger.
Contradiction with Luke 6:27
The demand for separation in Exodus 10:28 contradicts Luke 6:27's call to love and engage with one's enemies, challenging the notion of severing ties.
Luke 6:27: But I say unto you which hear, Love your enemies, do good to them which hate you,
Contradiction with 1 Peter 3:9
Exodus 10:28 embodies retaliation, but 1 Peter 3:9 advocates not retaliating and instead blessing others, presenting a moral and behavioral contradiction.
1 Peter 3:9: Not rendering evil for evil, or railing for railing: but contrariwise blessing; knowing that ye are thereunto called, that ye should inherit a blessing.
Paradox #1
Exodus 10:28 involves Pharaoh telling Moses to leave and never return or else he will be killed. The moral conflict here could be about the harshness and lack of forgiveness. It highlights a contradiction between vengeance and the Bible's teachings of mercy and reconciliation.