Contradiction with Ezekiel 18:20
Contrary to Exodus 12:13 which emphasizes collective judgment and protection based on external symbols, this verse asserts individual responsibility for sin.
Ezekiel 18:20: The soul that sinneth, it shall die. The son shall not bear the iniquity of the father, neither shall the father bear the iniquity of the son: the righteousness of the righteous shall be upon him, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon him.
Contradiction with Matthew 10:28
This passage shifts focus from physical safety, as mentioned in Exodus 12:13, to spiritual fear and reverence.
Matthew 10:28: And fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul: but rather fear him which is able to destroy both soul and body in hell.
Contradiction with Hebrews 10:4
Contradicts the notion in Exodus 12:13 of animal blood providing protection, emphasizing that animal sacrifices cannot remove sins.
Hebrews 10:4: For [it is] not possible that the blood of bulls and of goats should take away sins.
Paradox #1
The contradiction or inconsistency could be about the idea of blood serving as a protection against a widespread disaster, which might not have a natural or scientific explanation. The passage suggests a supernatural cause and effect, which conflicts with scientific understanding of cause and effect based on observable evidence.
Paradox #2
Some people might see a contradiction in the concept of harming some to protect others. The verse describes a situation where one group's safety depends on the harm to another group, which can be difficult to reconcile with the idea of fair and equal treatment for all. This can prompt questions about justice and morality.