Contradiction with Exodus 20:15
This verse, "Thou shalt not steal," contradicts with Exodus 12:35, where the Israelites take goods from the Egyptians.
Exodus 20:15: Thou shalt not steal.
Contradiction with Matthew 5:44
This verse, "But I say unto you, Love your enemies," contradicts with Exodus 12:35, where the Israelites are commanded to take from their enemies.
Matthew 5:44: But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;
Contradiction with Romans 13:9
This verse, which reiterates "Thou shalt not steal," contradicts with Exodus 12:35, where the Israelites are permitted to take from the Egyptians.
Romans 13:9: For this, Thou shalt not commit adultery, Thou shalt not kill, Thou shalt not steal, Thou shalt not bear false witness, Thou shalt not covet; and if [there be] any other commandment, it is briefly comprehended in this saying, namely, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.
Paradox #1
Some people see a potential contradiction in Exodus 12:35, where it says the Israelites took gold and silver from the Egyptians. This could seem inconsistent with commandments against stealing. However, it's often explained as fair compensation for their years of slavery, suggesting it wasn't considered stealing.
Paradox #2
Some people see a contradiction with this verse when comparing it to teachings about not stealing. In this verse, the Israelites take valuable items from the Egyptians, which might seem against the commandment, "You shall not steal." However, others argue that it's not stealing because the Egyptians had wronged the Israelites and God commanded them to take these items as a form of recompense.
Paradox #3
The contradiction might be that Exodus 12:35 describes the Israelites acquiring valuable items from the Egyptians despite being in a situation of enslavement. Historically, it's debated how a group of enslaved people could have left with such wealth without any resistance or complications from their captors, raising questions about the historical and logistical accuracy of this event.
Paradox #4
The contradiction in Exodus 12:35 could be about the idea that the Israelites took items made of gold and silver from the Egyptians without a practical explanation or historical evidence of such an event occurring on a large scale. This action might raise questions about the feasibility and lack of historical records supporting such wealth transfer during that time.
Paradox #5
The moral conflict in this verse could be that it involves taking things from others under the instructions given, which might be seen as contradicting the general moral teaching against stealing or causing harm to others. People might see a contradiction between following divine instructions and adhering to an ethical standard of fairness and respect for others' property.