Contradiction with Matthew 5:44
This verse teaches to love enemies and do good, while Exodus 12:36 describes taking from the Egyptians.
Matthew 5:44: But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;
Contradiction with Luke 6:29
This verse advises offering the other cheek or giving if someone takes, unlike the Israelites taking from Egyptians.
Luke 6:29: And unto him that smiteth thee on the [one] cheek offer also the other; and him that taketh away thy cloke forbid not [to take thy] coat also.
Contradiction with Romans 12:17
Advises not to repay evil for evil, contrasting with the Israelites despoiling Egyptians.
Romans 12:17: Recompense to no man evil for evil. Provide things honest in the sight of all men.
Contradiction with Proverbs 25:21-22
Encourages feeding enemies, not despoiling them, contradicting the spoiling actions in Exodus 12:36.
Proverbs 25:21-22: If thine enemy be hungry, give him bread to eat; and if he be thirsty, give him water to drink:
Contradiction with 1 Peter 3:9
Do not repay evil for evil, clashing with the Israelites taking from Egyptians.
1 Peter 3:9: Not rendering evil for evil, or railing for railing: but contrariwise blessing; knowing that ye are thereunto called, that ye should inherit a blessing.
Paradox #1
Exodus 12:36 could be seen as contradictory to passages that advise against stealing or taking what isn't rightfully yours. In this verse, the Israelites take items from the Egyptians as they leave, which might seem to conflict with commandments against stealing. However, some interpret this as rightful compensation for their years of slavery, suggesting a deeper context.
Paradox #2
The potential contradiction or conflict could be related to the idea of fairness and honesty. In Exodus 12:36, the Israelites are said to have taken items from the Egyptians, which might be seen as conflicting with teachings against stealing or unfairly taking others' belongings. Some might view this as contradicting principles of respect for others' property found elsewhere in the Bible.
Paradox #3
Exodus 12:36 talks about the Israelites receiving goods from the Egyptians before leaving Egypt. A potential contradiction might arise when considering historical records and archaeological evidence, which do not clearly support a large-scale exodus of this nature from Egypt. The lack of evidence outside the biblical narrative could lead to questions about the historicity of such an event.
Paradox #4
The contradiction in Exodus 12:36 could arise from the perspective that it describes an event where the Israelites take goods from the Egyptians during their departure. Some might see a conflict in the idea of taking possessions from others, which might seem inconsistent with teachings against stealing. However, this action is often justified within the context of the story as a form of reparation for the Israelites’ years of slavery.